Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Unveiling Iranian women''s beliefs and attitudes towards divorce]( "Unveiling Iranian women''s beliefs and attitudes towards divorce")
Unveiling Iranian women''s beliefs and attitudes towards divorce35,99 €![Personal Epistemology as Predictor of Attitudes toward ICT Usage]( "Personal Epistemology as Predictor of Attitudes toward ICT Usage")
Personal Epistemology as Predictor of Attitudes toward ICT Usage19,99 €![Parent and Teacher Attitudes Toward Bullying In School]( "Parent and Teacher Attitudes Toward Bullying In School")
Parent and Teacher Attitudes Toward Bullying In School50,99 €![Teachers' perceptions and attitudes toward childhood sexuality]( "Teachers' perceptions and attitudes toward childhood sexuality")
Teachers' perceptions and attitudes toward childhood sexuality32,99 €![Medical and non Medical Students' Attitudes toward Mental Illness]( "Medical and non Medical Students' Attitudes toward Mental Illness")
Medical and non Medical Students' Attitudes toward Mental Illness26,99 €![Development of positive attitudes toward members of different ethnic groups]( "Development of positive attitudes toward members of different ethnic groups")
Development of positive attitudes toward members of different ethnic groups44,99 €![Diabetes: attitudes, coping and self-care]( "Diabetes: attitudes, coping and self-care")
Diabetes: attitudes, coping and self-care26,99 €
This study examined the role of beliefs about fairness, merit and the typicality of different Affirmative Action policies (AAPs) in predicting support for Affirmative Action (AA). Consistent with predictions, beliefs that AA is unfair related to opposition toward AAPs involving strong preferential treatment (such as the hire of unqualified applicants). Fairness beliefs also related to opposition to AAPs employing softer approaches (such as AAPs involving efforts to recruit minority applicants). Beliefs that AA is unfair did not relate to race-blind or training policies, suggesting that beliefs about fairness do not always predict attitudes toward specific AAPs. Endorsement of the merit principle more strongly predicted attitudes toward AAPs than beliefs about fairness. Also consistent with predictions, endorsement of the merit principle related to opposition toward AAPs involving the hire of less qualified or unqualified applicants and those using quotas. As predicted, belief in the typicality of different AAPs predicted attitudes toward AA in general, with the belief that the hire of less qualified applicants is typical of AAPs significantly predicting opposition toward AA.