This study is the first systematic examination of debate negotiations in presidential election campaigns. Covering the campaigns from 1960 to 1988, it provides comparisons across election cycles and argues that debate negotiations are forms of political rhetoric that target multiple audiences.
This study is the first systematic examination of debate negotiations in presidential election campaigns. Covering the campaigns from 1960 to 1988, it provides comparisons across election cycles and argues that debate negotiations are forms of political rhetoric that target multiple audiences.
John W. Self is associate professor and chair of the Department of Communication at Truman State University.
Inhaltsangabe
Chapter 1: Why Study Presidential Debate Negotiation? Chapter 2: 1960: Nixon v. Kennedy Chapter 3: 1976: Ford v. Carter Chapter 4: 1980: Reagan v. Anderson v. Carter Chapter 5: 1984: Reagan v. Mondale Chapter 6: 1988: Bush v. Dukakis Chapter 7: Analysis Appendix 1: Contexts of Presidential Debate Negotiation, Part I Appendix 2: Contexts of Presidential Debate Negotiation, Part II Appendix 3: 1984 Memorandum of Understanding Appendix 4: 1988 Memorandum of Understanding
Chapter 1: Why Study Presidential Debate Negotiation? Chapter 2: 1960: Nixon v. Kennedy Chapter 3: 1976: Ford v. Carter Chapter 4: 1980: Reagan v. Anderson v. Carter Chapter 5: 1984: Reagan v. Mondale Chapter 6: 1988: Bush v. Dukakis Chapter 7: Analysis Appendix 1: Contexts of Presidential Debate Negotiation, Part I Appendix 2: Contexts of Presidential Debate Negotiation, Part II Appendix 3: 1984 Memorandum of Understanding Appendix 4: 1988 Memorandum of Understanding
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309