Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Proof That 22/7 Exceeds]( "Proof That 22/7 Exceeds")
Proof That 22/7 Exceeds22,99 €![Nonlinear Evolution Equations That Change Type]( "Nonlinear Evolution Equations That Change Type")
Nonlinear Evolution Equations That Change Type141,99 €![Nonlinear Evolution Equations That Change Type]( "Nonlinear Evolution Equations That Change Type")
Nonlinear Evolution Equations That Change Type83,99 €![A history of the mathematical theory of probability from the time of Pascal to that of Laplace]( "A history of the mathematical theory of probability from the time of Pascal to that of Laplace")
A history of the mathematical theory of probability from the time of Pascal to that of Laplace39,90 €![The Fourier transform and family distributional that are elemental sol]( "The Fourier transform and family distributional that are elemental sol")
The Fourier transform and family distributional that are elemental sol23,99 €![Original proof of Gödel's completeness theorem]( "Original proof of Gödel's completeness theorem")
Original proof of Gödel's completeness theorem22,99 €![Statistical Proof]( "Statistical Proof")
Statistical Proof22,99 €
High Quality Content by WIKIPEDIA articles! Proofs of the famous mathematical result that the rational number 22 7 is greater than date back to antiquity. What follows is a one-line modern mathematical proof that 22 7 , requiring only elementary techniques from calculus. The purpose is not primarily to convince the reader that 22 7 is indeed bigger than ; systematic methods of computing the value of exist. Unlike some elementary proofs, the calculus-based proof presented here is straightforward; its elegance results from its connections to the theory of diophantine approximations. Stephen Lucas calls this proposition "One of the more beautiful results related to approximating ". Julian Havil ends a discussion of continued fraction approximations of with the result, describing it as "impossible to resist mentioning" in that context. If one knows that is approximately 3.14159, then it trivially follows that 22/7. But it takes much less work to show that 22/7 than toshow that is approximately 3.14159.