Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The limits of lawful journalistic activity and the duty to indemnify]( "The limits of lawful journalistic activity and the duty to indemnify")
The limits of lawful journalistic activity and the duty to indemnify23,99 €![The legal discipline of damage resulting from diagnostic error]( "The legal discipline of damage resulting from diagnostic error")
The legal discipline of damage resulting from diagnostic error36,99 €![Civil liability in consumer relations]( "Civil liability in consumer relations")
Civil liability in consumer relations26,99 €![The responsibility of the providers]( "The responsibility of the providers")
The responsibility of the providers26,99 €![Existential Damage and Cancellation on the Internet]( "Existential Damage and Cancellation on the Internet")
Existential Damage and Cancellation on the Internet27,99 €![THE ROLE OF THE LAWYER IN REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS]( "THE ROLE OF THE LAWYER IN REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS")
THE ROLE OF THE LAWYER IN REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS26,99 €![The need in today's society to expand the legal standing of indirect victims of non-pecuniary damage]( "The need in today's society to expand the legal standing of indirect victims of non-pecuniary damage")
The need in today's society to expand the legal standing of indirect victims of non-pecuniary damage36,99 €
The purpose of this study is to understand the difficulties in enforcing the right to reparation provided for in the Civil Code against pedestrians who have caused traffic accidents, causing exclusively material damage. This work seeks to read the Brazilian traffic rules, addressing traffic offences and crimes, their characteristics and applicability when committed by pedestrians, as well as the perception of the normative silence in relation to the criminalisation of conduct practised by pedestrians, compared to similar conduct practised by vehicle drivers. The fact that the criminalisation is aimed exclusively at vehicle drivers is a normative inequality that constitutes an excess of protection for pedestrians, reverberating as an obstacle to the exercise of civil liability and consequently impacting on the offended party's balance of assets in cases that, although commonplace, were not provided for and listed by the legislator in the normative text.