Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Energy Research at Doe]( "Energy Research at Doe")
Energy Research at Doe70,99 €![Reducing the Fuel Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Medium- And Heavy-Duty Vehicles, Phase Two]( "Reducing the Fuel Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Medium- And Heavy-Duty Vehicles, Phase Two")
Reducing the Fuel Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Medium- And Heavy-Duty Vehicles, Phase Two48,99 €![Evaluation of Future Strategic and Energy Efficient Options for the U.S. Capitol Power Plant]( "Evaluation of Future Strategic and Energy Efficient Options for the U.S. Capitol Power Plant")
Evaluation of Future Strategic and Energy Efficient Options for the U.S. Capitol Power Plant25,99 €![Assessment of Solid-State Lighting, Phase Two]( "Assessment of Solid-State Lighting, Phase Two")
Assessment of Solid-State Lighting, Phase Two71,99 €![Progress in Improving Project Management at the Department of Energy]( "Progress in Improving Project Management at the Department of Energy")
Progress in Improving Project Management at the Department of Energy49,99 €![Progress in Improving Project Management at the Department of Energy]( "Progress in Improving Project Management at the Department of Energy")
Progress in Improving Project Management at the Department of Energy52,99 €![Evaluation of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Program]( "Evaluation of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Program")
Evaluation of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Program33,99 €
In 2001, the National Research Council (NRC) completed a congressionally mandated assessment of the benefits and costs of DOE's fossil energy and energy efficiency R&D programs, Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It? The Congress followed this retrospective study by directing DOE to request the NRC to develop a methodology for assessing prospective benefits. The first phase of this project--development of the methodology--began in December 2003. Phase two will make the methodology more robust and explore related issues, and subsequent phases will apply the methodology to review the prospective benefits of different DOE fossil energy and energy efficiency R&D programs. In developing this project, three considerations were particularly important. First, the study should adapt the work of the retrospective study. Second, the project should develop a methodology that provides a rigorous calculation of benefits and risks, and a practical and consistent process for its application. Third, the methodology should be transparent, should not require extensive resources for implementation, and should produce easily understood results. This report presents the results of phase one. It focuses on adaptation of the retrospective methodology to a prospective context.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.