Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Sustainable Development Goals and Sustainable Supply Chains in the Post-global Economy]( "Sustainable Development Goals and Sustainable Supply Chains in the Post-global Economy")
Sustainable Development Goals and Sustainable Supply Chains in the Post-global Economy88,99 €![Sustainable Development Goals and Sustainable Supply Chains in the Post-global Economy]( "Sustainable Development Goals and Sustainable Supply Chains in the Post-global Economy")
Sustainable Development Goals and Sustainable Supply Chains in the Post-global Economy63,99 €![Protecting the Global Civilian from Violence]( "Protecting the Global Civilian from Violence")
Protecting the Global Civilian from Violence198,99 €![Protecting the Global Environment]( "Protecting the Global Environment")
Protecting the Global Environment182,99 €![Are International Human Rights Instruments Effective In Protecting People¿s Rights from the Global Effects of Climate Change?]( "Are International Human Rights Instruments Effective In Protecting People¿s Rights from the Global Effects of Climate Change?")
Are International Human Rights Instruments Effective In Protecting People¿s Rights from the Global Effects of Climate Change?27,95 €![Global Energy Supply and Emissions]( "Global Energy Supply and Emissions")
Global Energy Supply and Emissions74,99 €![Security of the European Natural Gas Supply Constructivist Approach]( "Security of the European Natural Gas Supply Constructivist Approach")
Security of the European Natural Gas Supply Constructivist Approach32,99 €
Diligent application of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) approach is believed by many to provide a comprehensive system for food safety management. This belief, however, is not shared uniformly by all stakeholders. Because of the dichotomy of opinion surrounding food safety, there is a compelling need for additional dialogue and consensus on this issue. The aim of this expert survey instrument is to identify the gaps and the areas of agreement among various stakeholders. Two hundred and thirty-one survey instruments were received out of three hundred and sixty sent (64.2% response rate) to food safety professionals in academia, industry, federal and state government, and consumer protection groups.