Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Offline Persönlichkeit vs. Online Persönlichkeit]( "Offline Persönlichkeit vs. Online Persönlichkeit")
Offline Persönlichkeit vs. Online Persönlichkeit17,95 €![Psychologische Usability anhand von Avataren]( "Psychologische Usability anhand von Avataren")
Psychologische Usability anhand von Avataren18,95 €![Using the Theory of Reasoned Action to Predict Safe Food Handling]( "Using the Theory of Reasoned Action to Predict Safe Food Handling")
Using the Theory of Reasoned Action to Predict Safe Food Handling51,99 €![The Art of Loving]( "The Art of Loving")
The Art of Loving6,99 €![Handwriting paper with dotted midline-8.5]( "Handwriting paper with dotted midline-8.5")
Handwriting paper with dotted midline-8.5"x11" 120 pages20,99 €![Psychological Testing of American Minorities]( "Psychological Testing of American Minorities")
Psychological Testing of American Minorities187,99 €![Dino ABC -Handwriting Paper with dotted midline Large Print 8,5]( "Dino ABC -Handwriting Paper with dotted midline Large Print 8,5")
Dino ABC -Handwriting Paper with dotted midline Large Print 8,5"x 11" ,120 pages18,99 €
People are now taking traditional personality tests
via the Internet, but are the results the same? The
current study is one of the few investigations that
has addressed this question directly. This
particular study has used experimental methods to
test this question, which sets it apart from most
research on Web-based psychological testing.
Another unique feature of this study is its approach
to testing both media forms (Web and Paper) over a
variety of well-established psychological
instruments, and comparing both media forms of each
instrument side by side, to see if the Web versions
of these psychological measures are equivalent to
the traditional paper-and-pencil versions of these
instruments. This approach increases the
reliability and validity of the results. Evidence
from the study suggested an equivalence of validity
coefficients and it was concluded that the two media
types were generally equivalent.
via the Internet, but are the results the same? The
current study is one of the few investigations that
has addressed this question directly. This
particular study has used experimental methods to
test this question, which sets it apart from most
research on Web-based psychological testing.
Another unique feature of this study is its approach
to testing both media forms (Web and Paper) over a
variety of well-established psychological
instruments, and comparing both media forms of each
instrument side by side, to see if the Web versions
of these psychological measures are equivalent to
the traditional paper-and-pencil versions of these
instruments. This approach increases the
reliability and validity of the results. Evidence
from the study suggested an equivalence of validity
coefficients and it was concluded that the two media
types were generally equivalent.