Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Kompetenzen]( "Kompetenzen")
Kompetenzen119,00 €![Land and Local Government in Botswana]( "Land and Local Government in Botswana")
Land and Local Government in Botswana19,99 €![The legitimacy of constitutional mutation through judicial interpretation]( "The legitimacy of constitutional mutation through judicial interpretation")
The legitimacy of constitutional mutation through judicial interpretation55,99 €![Appeal on grounds of excess of the administrative authority's powers]( "Appeal on grounds of excess of the administrative authority's powers")
Appeal on grounds of excess of the administrative authority's powers40,99 €![Recurso por excesso de poder da autoridade administrativa]( "Recurso por excesso de poder da autoridade administrativa")
Recurso por excesso de poder da autoridade administrativa40,99 €![A Practical Guide to Local Authority Leisure Contracts in England and Wales in the Time of Covid-19, Brexit and Beyond]( "A Practical Guide to Local Authority Leisure Contracts in England and Wales in the Time of Covid-19, Brexit and Beyond")
A Practical Guide to Local Authority Leisure Contracts in England and Wales in the Time of Covid-19, Brexit and Beyond84,99 €![State Legitimacy and Failure in International Law]( "State Legitimacy and Failure in International Law")
State Legitimacy and Failure in International Law179,99 €
Inter- and supranational courts derive their legitimacy partly from an institutional comparison: judges' legal expertise and the quality of judicial procedures justify a court's claim to authority towards other branches of government and other courts with overlapping jurisdiction. To provide a benchmark for assessing judicial outcomes that is compatible with democratic commitments, Johann Laux suggests a new normative category, Public Epistemic Authority (PEA). It builds on the mechanisms behind theories of collective intelligence and empirical research on judicial decision-making. PEA tracks judges' collective ability to reliably identify breaches of law. It focuses on cognitive tasks in adjudication. The author applies PEA to the Court of Justice of the European Union and offers suggestions for improving its institutional design.