E. Digby Baltzell

Puritan Boston and Quaker Philadelphia

• Gebundenes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

Baltzell traces the differences in class authority and leadership in Boston and Philadelphia to the contrasting values of the Puritan founders of the Bay Colony and the Quaker founders of the City of Brotherly Love.

---

Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Routledge
• 2. Auflage
• Seitenzahl: 604
• Erscheinungstermin: 2. Oktober 2017
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 235mm x 157mm x 37mm
• Gewicht: 1013g
• ISBN-13: 9781138531314
• ISBN-10: 1138531316
• Artikelnr.: 50496888

Autorenporträt

E. Digby Baltzell

Inhaltsangabe

One: A Problem Defined
I: Class Authority and Leadership
Two: Privileged and Ruling Classes: A Theory of Class Authority and Leadership
Three: Boston Brahmins and Philadelphia Gentlemen: An Empirical Test
II: Puritan and Quaker Patterns of Culture and Their European Roots
Four: Reformation England: From Brawling Lord to Sober Judge
Five: The Puritan Revolution and the Rise of Quakerism
Six: Puritan and Quaker Patterns of Culture: The Theology of Culture
III: The Colonial Experience: Comparative History
Seven: The Founding of Massachusetts and Pennsylvania
Eight: The Classic Ages of the Two Colonies
Nine: Heresy, Hierarchy, and Higher Education
Ten: Provincial Boston and Cosmopolitan Philadelphia in the Age of Thomas Hutchinson and Benjamin Franklin
IV: The Age of Transition
Eleven: The Great Generation: Founders of the New Nation
Twelve: Philadelphia's Silver Age and Boston's Federalist Family Founders
V: The National Experience: Comparative Institutions
Thirteen: Wealth: The Fertilizer of Family Trees
Fourteen: Education and Leadership
Fifteen: Boston and Philadelphia and the American Mind
Sixteen: Art and Architecture
Seventeen: The Learned Professions: Law, Medicine, and the Church
Eighteen: The Governing of Men: Deference and Defiant Democracy
VI: Two Test Cases
Nineteen: Catholics in Two Cultures
Twenty: Philadelphia Orthodox Quakerism: A Deviant Case Suggests a Rule