Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Right, Power, and Faquanism]( "Right, Power, and Faquanism")
Right, Power, and Faquanism268,99 €![Law, Narrative and Reality]( "Law, Narrative and Reality")
Law, Narrative and Reality77,99 €![Community Law in the French Courts]( "Community Law in the French Courts")
Community Law in the French Courts39,99 €![Impractical Justice]( "Impractical Justice")
Impractical Justice18,99 €![Summary Justice in the City]( "Summary Justice in the City")
Summary Justice in the City98,99 €![Justice as Sanctuary]( "Justice as Sanctuary")
Justice as Sanctuary26,99 €![Life and Letters of Joseph Story, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, and Dane Professor of Law at Harvard University]( "Life and Letters of Joseph Story, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, and Dane Professor of Law at Harvard University")
Life and Letters of Joseph Story, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, and Dane Professor of Law at Harvard University42,99 €
This exploratory study endeavored to examine the relationshipamong several important organizational forces and their impact ondiversity at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ). Itwas posited that clarity of correctional purpose, power preference,and organizational justice would affect marginalization of some,leading to increased attrition ideation and finally to diversity.Path analysis of data from a survey of 127 correctional officersdid not support the model. A new model was constructed using theconcepts in the model, as well as the thinking that led to thecreation of the original model. The model derived from the dataindicated the possibility that different forms of organizationaljustice influence anger and marginalization separately, ultimatelyinfluencing attrition ideation, perceptions of procedural justice,and finally perceptions of functional difference. Suggestions forcorrectional executives implied by the findings include payingclose attention to perceptions of marginalization or unfairnessamong line staff, changing promotion and selection procedures inorder to be more transparent, and dismantling wardensovereignty.