Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Caspian Sea]( "The Caspian Sea")
The Caspian Sea125,99 €![The Caspian Sea]( "The Caspian Sea")
The Caspian Sea125,99 €![On the Sociology of International Law and International Society]( "On the Sociology of International Law and International Society")
On the Sociology of International Law and International Society42,99 €![Scientific and Technical Means of Distinguishing Between Natural and Other Outbreaks of Disease]( "Scientific and Technical Means of Distinguishing Between Natural and Other Outbreaks of Disease")
Scientific and Technical Means of Distinguishing Between Natural and Other Outbreaks of Disease83,99 €![Transnational Public Governance]( "Transnational Public Governance")
Transnational Public Governance37,99 €![Socialist Investment Cycles]( "Socialist Investment Cycles")
Socialist Investment Cycles42,99 €![Political Empowerment of Women]( "Political Empowerment of Women")
Political Empowerment of Women42,99 €
Recent years have witnessed a rapidly growing interest in the use and construction of "qualitative" indicators of labour standards.
Qualitative indicators, while generally having numerical values, are based on such methods as grading by experts, the coding of legislation, and the coding of other textual sources addressing violations of a more de facto nature. Measuring compliance with labour standards is an undertaking intrinsically fraught with difficulty. For there are a number of possible sources of measurement error, both random and non-random, that are unique to such indicators, on top of those that affect qualitative and quantitative indicators alike. The growing use of qualitative indicators of labour standards thus raises a number of questions about comparative methods of construction as well as the appropriateness of particular methods for particular applications. This volume results from a seminar that was organized to address these and related questions.
Qualitative indicators, while generally having numerical values, are based on such methods as grading by experts, the coding of legislation, and the coding of other textual sources addressing violations of a more de facto nature. Measuring compliance with labour standards is an undertaking intrinsically fraught with difficulty. For there are a number of possible sources of measurement error, both random and non-random, that are unique to such indicators, on top of those that affect qualitative and quantitative indicators alike. The growing use of qualitative indicators of labour standards thus raises a number of questions about comparative methods of construction as well as the appropriateness of particular methods for particular applications. This volume results from a seminar that was organized to address these and related questions.