84,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei*
Versandfertig in über 4 Wochen
payback
42 °P sammeln
  • Broschiertes Buch

Aggressively litigating intricately complex federal RICO §1962(d) conspiracy relief claims and RICO §1962(d) criminal counts present intensely technical issues. These exceedingly significant complex issues include application of the Pinkerton Doctrine and the concept of mediate causation when intimately analyzed and critically evaluated in the context of judicially differentiating inexplicably inconsistent and diametrically inapposite interpretations of the Pinkerton Doctrine, mediate causation, and mediate causality, involving prosecuting and litigating racketeering conspiracies of racial and…mehr

Produktbeschreibung
Aggressively litigating intricately complex federal RICO §1962(d) conspiracy relief claims and RICO §1962(d) criminal counts present intensely technical issues. These exceedingly significant complex issues include application of the Pinkerton Doctrine and the concept of mediate causation when intimately analyzed and critically evaluated in the context of judicially differentiating inexplicably inconsistent and diametrically inapposite interpretations of the Pinkerton Doctrine, mediate causation, and mediate causality, involving prosecuting and litigating racketeering conspiracies of racial and ethnic minorities and contrasted with prosecuting and litigating white collar professionals and corporate financial institutions. The express purpose of this Abstract section of this multi-volume treatise is expressly intended to critically contrast judicially incongruent, inexplicably inconsistent interpretations and varying applications of these doctrinal postulates by critically analyzing federal decisional authorities rendering conflicting results. These results are graphically exemplified in the context of judicially differentiating and readily distinguishing litigation in the criminal RICO §1962(d) conspiratorial context of racial minorities and ethnic minorities indicted with commission of federal statutory offenses aggressively prosecuted resulting in conviction, contrasted with civil RICO §1962(d) conspiratorial litigation involving white collar professionals and corporate financial institutions accused of commission of federal statutory offenses arising in monetary and financial transactions involving property loss. This treatise concludes that Pinkerton and mediate causation be accorded judicially symmetrical application without judicial differentiation between RICO §1962(d) criminal prosecutions and RICO §1962(d) civil litigation.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Autorenporträt
The author specializes in advising upon technically intricate complex RICO § 1962(d) conspiracy litigation with emphasis upon application of the Pinkerton Doctrine [Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S. Ct. 1180, 90 L. Ed. 1489 (1946) (Douglas, J.)] and the concept of mediate causation in RICO § 1962(d) conspiracy litigation and similarly in the context of RICO aiding and abetting of RICO § 1962(d) conspiracy and RICO § 1962(d) conspiracy to commit RICO aiding and abetting. James N. Gross, Esq., of Philadelphia, PA., and the author represented appellees/plaintiffs in Smith v. Berg, 247 F.3d 532 (3rd Cir. 2001), and authored Judicially Fusing The Pinkerton Doctrine To RICO Conspiracy Litigation Through The Concept of Mediate Causation, 97 Kentucky Law Journal 665 (2009). The author expresses sincere appreciation and recognizes the significant contributions of legal assistant Mary Jacqueline Feldman. Former staff counsel serving on the 1978 House Select Committee on Assassinations. Served as member of Board of Advisors of RICO Litigation Reporter, publishing submissions critically addressing technically intricate complex RICO issues and served as member of the Editorial Board of Civil RICO Report. The author respectfully dedicates this intensely extensive treatise in eternal remembrance of and honoured memoriam to Juretta Elizabeth Oliver (10 November 1929 - 25 June 1993).