Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Conflict in Syria and the Failure of International Law to Protect People Globally]( "The Conflict in Syria and the Failure of International Law to Protect People Globally")
The Conflict in Syria and the Failure of International Law to Protect People Globally198,99 €![A failure of international law: case study of the Syrian Arab Republic]( "A failure of international law: case study of the Syrian Arab Republic")
A failure of international law: case study of the Syrian Arab Republic30,99 €![The Failure of Corporate Law]( "The Failure of Corporate Law")
The Failure of Corporate Law81,99 €![A Principled Approach to State Failure]( "A Principled Approach to State Failure")
A Principled Approach to State Failure165,99 €![The Law of Failure]( "The Law of Failure")
The Law of Failure93,99 €![The Nigerian Civil War and the Failure of United Nations]( "The Nigerian Civil War and the Failure of United Nations")
The Nigerian Civil War and the Failure of United Nations32,99 €![How To Stop For A Cop: Reconnecting Law Enforcement and The Community]( "How To Stop For A Cop: Reconnecting Law Enforcement and The Community")
How To Stop For A Cop: Reconnecting Law Enforcement and The Community23,99 €
he institutional and normative reform undertaken in 2006 within CEMAC reached its climax on June 25, 2008. This is the case of the formalization of the recourse in default. The clarifications brought by the said reform actually condition the effectiveness of CEMAC community law. By establishing the judicial chamber as a court, the referral mechanism within the framework of the action for failure to fulfil obligations should significantly contribute to the strengthening of this right. It therefore became interesting to devote a study to this subject. In this context, the question that has been raised here is: what characterizes the referral of cases to the courts for failure to fulfil obligations under CEMAC community law? It emerges from the study that it is an ambiguous referral, because if it is true that on the substantial level the conditions of referral are well formalized, however on the formal level, it is strongly obstructed. Indeed, on this last aspect, it weakens the effective implementation of the recourse in failure. However, the organic aspect, i.e. the jurisdiction to be seized does not pose any problem since it is precisely indicated. On the other hand, the procedural aspect, i.e.