Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Studies of Business Law ¿ Recent Developments and Perspectives]( "Studies of Business Law ¿ Recent Developments and Perspectives")
Studies of Business Law ¿ Recent Developments and Perspectives84,50 €![The External Dimension of the European Union¿s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice]( "The External Dimension of the European Union¿s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice")
The External Dimension of the European Union¿s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice67,55 €![Transnational Labour Regulation]( "Transnational Labour Regulation")
Transnational Labour Regulation66,15 €![Intellectual Property, Market Power and the Public Interest]( "Intellectual Property, Market Power and the Public Interest")
Intellectual Property, Market Power and the Public Interest68,95 €![Human rights abuses in the contemporary world]( "Human rights abuses in the contemporary world")
Human rights abuses in the contemporary world67,55 €![Islam and State in the EU]( "Islam and State in the EU")
Islam and State in the EU84,50 €![The EU Education Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era]( "The EU Education Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era")
The EU Education Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era83,00 €
Refusal to license intellectual property rights (IPRs) are an ongoing topic within the enforcement of Article 102 TFEU (ex Article 82 EC). Nevertheless, so far an economic founded instrument to analyse these cases is missing. To close this gap, the Innovation Effects and Appropriability Test will be developed throughout this book. Innovation research has been showing that firms rely on more appropriation mechanisms than only IPRs. The availability of these alternative instruments depends on the involved technologies, the kind of innovation, the concerned industry and so on. Consequently, it is in the centre of the Innovation Effects and Appropriability Test to analyse whether the dominant firm could rely on other appropriation instruments to protect its innovation and to recoup its investments in R&D.