Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![United States Opposition to the International Criminal Court: Debunking the Apparent Contradiction]( "United States Opposition to the International Criminal Court: Debunking the Apparent Contradiction")
United States Opposition to the International Criminal Court: Debunking the Apparent Contradiction60,99 €![Peace in Justice: Reflections from a Career in the Criminal Justice System]( "Peace in Justice: Reflections from a Career in the Criminal Justice System")
Peace in Justice: Reflections from a Career in the Criminal Justice System17,99 €![The Dartmouth College Causes and the Supreme Court of the United States]( "The Dartmouth College Causes and the Supreme Court of the United States")
The Dartmouth College Causes and the Supreme Court of the United States28,99 €![Applying the Capital Jury Project Finding to Court-Martial Practice]( "Applying the Capital Jury Project Finding to Court-Martial Practice")
Applying the Capital Jury Project Finding to Court-Martial Practice61,99 €![Transnational Crime and the Criminal-Terrorist Nexus: Synergies and Corporate Trends]( "Transnational Crime and the Criminal-Terrorist Nexus: Synergies and Corporate Trends")
Transnational Crime and the Criminal-Terrorist Nexus: Synergies and Corporate Trends61,99 €![The Extent to which the Influence of Jeremy Bentham Prevailed in the Reformation of Criminal England]( "The Extent to which the Influence of Jeremy Bentham Prevailed in the Reformation of Criminal England")
The Extent to which the Influence of Jeremy Bentham Prevailed in the Reformation of Criminal England60,99 €![War, Law and Order, Case Study: Australian Whole-of-Government Efforts to Develop the Security and Criminal Justice Sectors in Stabilization]( "War, Law and Order, Case Study: Australian Whole-of-Government Efforts to Develop the Security and Criminal Justice Sectors in Stabilization")
War, Law and Order, Case Study: Australian Whole-of-Government Efforts to Develop the Security and Criminal Justice Sectors in Stabilization60,99 €
This research paper examines the Statute of Rome and the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to determine if United States participation in global peace operations is at risk. It briefly examines the history of the ICC, the Statute of Rome, and discusses current United Nations peace operations. The paper also explores the divergent views regarding the ICC as they relate to the US rejection of ICC jurisdiction. As the primary supporter of international peace operations, the US has decided that it will not provide personnel for peace operations within any state that has not signed a bilateral agreement under Article 98 of the Rome Statute. The US rejection of ICC jurisdiction, and requirement for Bilateral Immunity Agreements, will limit the participation of US Forces in international peace operations.