Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Legitimization of Religious Symbols in the Education - Development towards Pluralism or Secularism]( "Legitimization of Religious Symbols in the Education - Development towards Pluralism or Secularism")
Legitimization of Religious Symbols in the Education - Development towards Pluralism or Secularism133,05 €![Proselytising the Regulation of Religious Bodies in South Africa]( "Proselytising the Regulation of Religious Bodies in South Africa")
Proselytising the Regulation of Religious Bodies in South Africa26,99 €![Effective Legal Remedies in Criminal Justice System. European Perspective]( "Effective Legal Remedies in Criminal Justice System. European Perspective")
Effective Legal Remedies in Criminal Justice System. European Perspective59,95 €![French Law on Secularity and Conspicuous Religious Symbols in Schools]( "French Law on Secularity and Conspicuous Religious Symbols in Schools")
French Law on Secularity and Conspicuous Religious Symbols in Schools32,99 €![INDIVIDUAL REFERRAL TO THE REGIONAL COURTS OF DH]( "INDIVIDUAL REFERRAL TO THE REGIONAL COURTS OF DH")
INDIVIDUAL REFERRAL TO THE REGIONAL COURTS OF DH39,99 €![The ECtHR Workload Crisis ¿ Protocols No. 14, 15 and 16]( "The ECtHR Workload Crisis ¿ Protocols No. 14, 15 and 16")
The ECtHR Workload Crisis ¿ Protocols No. 14, 15 and 1623,99 €![Rising Islamophobia: Impact on Muslim Well-being]( "Rising Islamophobia: Impact on Muslim Well-being")
Rising Islamophobia: Impact on Muslim Well-being15,00 €
The right to manifest and display religious symbols in the public sphere is a highly debated subject since states in Europe have adopted secular values. The debated Islamic headscarf and the initiative on banning the building of minarets in Switzerland are two recently discussed issues address by the European Court of Human Rights. The demand for religious rights in a region that often promotes a liberal non-religious value will be discussed by analyzing and evaluating European case law. This evaluation is important since contracting states and the Court use secularism and other tools of interpretation as its strategy to promote pluralism. Secularism as a political ideology protects already existing norms in society which makes it difficult for religious minorities to fully manifest and display religious symbols in the public sphere. Restrictions on religious manifestation and the display of symbols is more likely to be limited when manifested in parastatal organizations. The question open for discussion is whether the limitation of article 9 regarding religious symbols is a favorable strategy when arguing for the value of culture, identity and the protection of pluralism.