Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Measuring Multinational Interoperability: Early Development of the Army Interoperability Measurement System (Aim]( "Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Measuring Multinational Interoperability: Early Development of the Army Interoperability Measurement System (Aim")
Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Measuring Multinational Interoperability: Early Development of the Army Interoperability Measurement System (Aim17,99 €![Assessment of Deployment- And Mobilization-To-Dwell Policies for Active and Reserve Component Forces]( "Assessment of Deployment- And Mobilization-To-Dwell Policies for Active and Reserve Component Forces")
Assessment of Deployment- And Mobilization-To-Dwell Policies for Active and Reserve Component Forces28,99 €![Assessing the Effectiveness of Future Concepts in the U.S. Air Force]( "Assessing the Effectiveness of Future Concepts in the U.S. Air Force")
Assessing the Effectiveness of Future Concepts in the U.S. Air Force23,99 €![How to Effectively Assess the Impact of Non-Lethal Weapons as Intermediate Force Capabilities]( "How to Effectively Assess the Impact of Non-Lethal Weapons as Intermediate Force Capabilities")
How to Effectively Assess the Impact of Non-Lethal Weapons as Intermediate Force Capabilities35,99 €![Running the Joint: Air Force Efforts to Build a Joint Task Force Headquarters]( "Running the Joint: Air Force Efforts to Build a Joint Task Force Headquarters")
Running the Joint: Air Force Efforts to Build a Joint Task Force Headquarters46,99 €![Forecasting End Strength in the U.S. Army Reserve: An Integrated Modeling Concept]( "Forecasting End Strength in the U.S. Army Reserve: An Integrated Modeling Concept")
Forecasting End Strength in the U.S. Army Reserve: An Integrated Modeling Concept32,99 €![Does the U.S. Economy Benefit from U.S. Alliances and Forward Military Presence?]( "Does the U.S. Economy Benefit from U.S. Alliances and Forward Military Presence?")
Does the U.S. Economy Benefit from U.S. Alliances and Forward Military Presence?25,99 €
The U.S. Army has several levers at its disposal to try to meet its recruiting mission, with resources jointly used for both Regular Army (RA) and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) accessions. These resources differ in their cost per additional recruit produced and the lead time necessary to change individual resourcing levels and affect enlistments. The Army can also modify recruit eligibility policies to help it achieve its accession requirement within available resources. Recruiting resources and enlistment eligibility policies work together as a system to produce RA and USAR recruits, and understanding their interactions under varying requirements and environments enables decisionmakers to use their limited resources more effectively and efficiently to achieve the Army's accession requirements. The authors present a model-the Reserve Recruiting Resource Model (RRRM)-designed to optimize the resource levels and mix needed to achieve future USAR recruiting goals under changing enlisted accession requirements and recruiting environments and alternative eligibility policies for potential recruits. The model also enables comparison of alternative courses of action. This research builds on prior work by the RAND Arroyo Center on the effectiveness and lead times of alternative recruiting resources. In their results, the authors discuss using the RRRM to predict annual accessions from a specified baseline resourcing plan and provide several examples of how the tool can be used to assess potential recruiting resource and policy trade-offs or to prepare for alternative recruiting requirements via optimization of recruiting resources used for USAR recruiting.