Retributivism Has a Past
Has It a Future?
Herausgeber: Tonry, Michael
Retributivism Has a Past
Has It a Future?
Herausgeber: Tonry, Michael
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
A collection of essays by major figures in punishment theory, law, and philosophy that reconsiders the popularity and prospects of retributivism, the notion that punishment is morally justified because people have behaved wrongly.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections249,99 €
- Heather StrangRepair or Revenge164,99 €
- Catherine AppletonLife After Life Imprisonment140,99 €
- John PrattPunishment and Civilization65,99 €
- John PrattPunishment and Civilization220,99 €
- Contesting Carceral Logic198,99 €
- Patrick Bashizi Bashige MurhulaVictim Participation Rights before the International Criminal Court36,99 €
-
-
-
A collection of essays by major figures in punishment theory, law, and philosophy that reconsiders the popularity and prospects of retributivism, the notion that punishment is morally justified because people have behaved wrongly.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Oxford University Press, USA
- Seitenzahl: 304
- Erscheinungstermin: 12. Dezember 2011
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 236mm x 163mm x 33mm
- Gewicht: 499g
- ISBN-13: 9780199798278
- ISBN-10: 0199798273
- Artikelnr.: 37253054
- Verlag: Oxford University Press, USA
- Seitenzahl: 304
- Erscheinungstermin: 12. Dezember 2011
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 236mm x 163mm x 33mm
- Gewicht: 499g
- ISBN-13: 9780199798278
- ISBN-10: 0199798273
- Artikelnr.: 37253054
Michael Tonry is Professor of Law and Public Policy, University of Minnesota Law School, and Senior Fellow at the Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement, Free University Amsterdam.
* Preface
* One: Can Twenty-first Century Punishment Policies be Justified in
Principle?
* Michael Tonry, University of Minnesota
* Two: What Does Wrongdoing Deserve?
* John Kleinig, CUNY
* Three: Is Twenty-first Century Punishment Post-Desert?
* Matt Matravers, York University
* Four: Responsibility, Restoration, and Retribution
* R. A. Duff, University of Minnesota
* Five: Punishment and Desert-adjusted Utilitarianism
* Jesper Ryberg, Roskilde University, Copenhagen
* Six: The Future of State Punishment: The Role of Public Opinion in
Sentencing
* Julian V. Roberts, Oxford University
* Seven: A Political Theory of Imprisonment for Public Protection
* Peter Ramsay, London School of Economics
* Eight: Terror as a Theory of Punishment
* Alice Ristroph, Seton Hall University
* Nine: Can Above-desert Penalties Be Justified by Competing
Deontological Theories?
* Richard S. Frase, University of Minnesota
* Ten: Never Mind the Pain; It's a Measure! Justifying Measures as Part
of the Dutch Bifurcated System of Sanctions
* Jan de Keijser, University of Leiden
* Eleven: Retributivism, Proportionality, and the Challenge of the Drug
Court Movement
* Douglas Husak, Rutgers University
* Twelve: Drug Treatment Courts as Communicative Punishment
* Michael M. O'Hear, Marquette University
* Thirteen: Reflections on Punishment Futures: The Desert-Model Debate
and the Importance of the Criminal Law Context
* Andreas von Hirsch, Cambridge University
* One: Can Twenty-first Century Punishment Policies be Justified in
Principle?
* Michael Tonry, University of Minnesota
* Two: What Does Wrongdoing Deserve?
* John Kleinig, CUNY
* Three: Is Twenty-first Century Punishment Post-Desert?
* Matt Matravers, York University
* Four: Responsibility, Restoration, and Retribution
* R. A. Duff, University of Minnesota
* Five: Punishment and Desert-adjusted Utilitarianism
* Jesper Ryberg, Roskilde University, Copenhagen
* Six: The Future of State Punishment: The Role of Public Opinion in
Sentencing
* Julian V. Roberts, Oxford University
* Seven: A Political Theory of Imprisonment for Public Protection
* Peter Ramsay, London School of Economics
* Eight: Terror as a Theory of Punishment
* Alice Ristroph, Seton Hall University
* Nine: Can Above-desert Penalties Be Justified by Competing
Deontological Theories?
* Richard S. Frase, University of Minnesota
* Ten: Never Mind the Pain; It's a Measure! Justifying Measures as Part
of the Dutch Bifurcated System of Sanctions
* Jan de Keijser, University of Leiden
* Eleven: Retributivism, Proportionality, and the Challenge of the Drug
Court Movement
* Douglas Husak, Rutgers University
* Twelve: Drug Treatment Courts as Communicative Punishment
* Michael M. O'Hear, Marquette University
* Thirteen: Reflections on Punishment Futures: The Desert-Model Debate
and the Importance of the Criminal Law Context
* Andreas von Hirsch, Cambridge University
* Preface
* One: Can Twenty-first Century Punishment Policies be Justified in
Principle?
* Michael Tonry, University of Minnesota
* Two: What Does Wrongdoing Deserve?
* John Kleinig, CUNY
* Three: Is Twenty-first Century Punishment Post-Desert?
* Matt Matravers, York University
* Four: Responsibility, Restoration, and Retribution
* R. A. Duff, University of Minnesota
* Five: Punishment and Desert-adjusted Utilitarianism
* Jesper Ryberg, Roskilde University, Copenhagen
* Six: The Future of State Punishment: The Role of Public Opinion in
Sentencing
* Julian V. Roberts, Oxford University
* Seven: A Political Theory of Imprisonment for Public Protection
* Peter Ramsay, London School of Economics
* Eight: Terror as a Theory of Punishment
* Alice Ristroph, Seton Hall University
* Nine: Can Above-desert Penalties Be Justified by Competing
Deontological Theories?
* Richard S. Frase, University of Minnesota
* Ten: Never Mind the Pain; It's a Measure! Justifying Measures as Part
of the Dutch Bifurcated System of Sanctions
* Jan de Keijser, University of Leiden
* Eleven: Retributivism, Proportionality, and the Challenge of the Drug
Court Movement
* Douglas Husak, Rutgers University
* Twelve: Drug Treatment Courts as Communicative Punishment
* Michael M. O'Hear, Marquette University
* Thirteen: Reflections on Punishment Futures: The Desert-Model Debate
and the Importance of the Criminal Law Context
* Andreas von Hirsch, Cambridge University
* One: Can Twenty-first Century Punishment Policies be Justified in
Principle?
* Michael Tonry, University of Minnesota
* Two: What Does Wrongdoing Deserve?
* John Kleinig, CUNY
* Three: Is Twenty-first Century Punishment Post-Desert?
* Matt Matravers, York University
* Four: Responsibility, Restoration, and Retribution
* R. A. Duff, University of Minnesota
* Five: Punishment and Desert-adjusted Utilitarianism
* Jesper Ryberg, Roskilde University, Copenhagen
* Six: The Future of State Punishment: The Role of Public Opinion in
Sentencing
* Julian V. Roberts, Oxford University
* Seven: A Political Theory of Imprisonment for Public Protection
* Peter Ramsay, London School of Economics
* Eight: Terror as a Theory of Punishment
* Alice Ristroph, Seton Hall University
* Nine: Can Above-desert Penalties Be Justified by Competing
Deontological Theories?
* Richard S. Frase, University of Minnesota
* Ten: Never Mind the Pain; It's a Measure! Justifying Measures as Part
of the Dutch Bifurcated System of Sanctions
* Jan de Keijser, University of Leiden
* Eleven: Retributivism, Proportionality, and the Challenge of the Drug
Court Movement
* Douglas Husak, Rutgers University
* Twelve: Drug Treatment Courts as Communicative Punishment
* Michael M. O'Hear, Marquette University
* Thirteen: Reflections on Punishment Futures: The Desert-Model Debate
and the Importance of the Criminal Law Context
* Andreas von Hirsch, Cambridge University