Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Review of Nasa's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks]( "Review of Nasa's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks")
Review of Nasa's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks40,99 €![Review of Nasa's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks]( "Review of Nasa's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks")
Review of Nasa's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks53,99 €![Review of Nasa's Longitudinal Study of Astronaut Health]( "Review of Nasa's Longitudinal Study of Astronaut Health")
Review of Nasa's Longitudinal Study of Astronaut Health33,99 €![Review of the Space Communications Program of Nasa's Space Operations Mission Directorate]( "Review of the Space Communications Program of Nasa's Space Operations Mission Directorate")
Review of the Space Communications Program of Nasa's Space Operations Mission Directorate33,99 €![Review of Goals and Plans for Nasa's Space and Earth Sciences]( "Review of Goals and Plans for Nasa's Space and Earth Sciences")
Review of Goals and Plans for Nasa's Space and Earth Sciences33,99 €![Review of Nasa's Solid-Earth Science Strategy]( "Review of Nasa's Solid-Earth Science Strategy")
Review of Nasa's Solid-Earth Science Strategy33,99 €![Review of Nasa's Aerospace Technology Enterprise]( "Review of Nasa's Aerospace Technology Enterprise")
Review of Nasa's Aerospace Technology Enterprise55,99 €
Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks 2014 Letter Report is the second in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration space flights. This report builds on the 2008 IOM report Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books: A Letter Report, which provided an initial and brief review of the evidence reports. This letter report reviews seven evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input. The report analyzes each evidence report's overall quality, which included readability; internal consistency; the source and breadth of cited evidence; identification of existing knowledge and research gaps; authorship expertise; and, if applicable, response to recommendations from the 2008 IOM letter report.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.