Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report]( "A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report")
A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report40,99 €![Review of the Environmental Protection Agency's Draft Iris Assessment of Tetrachloroethylene]( "Review of the Environmental Protection Agency's Draft Iris Assessment of Tetrachloroethylene")
Review of the Environmental Protection Agency's Draft Iris Assessment of Tetrachloroethylene65,99 €![Leveraging Advances in Modern Science to Revitalize Low-Dose Radiation Research in the United States]( "Leveraging Advances in Modern Science to Revitalize Low-Dose Radiation Research in the United States")
Leveraging Advances in Modern Science to Revitalize Low-Dose Radiation Research in the United States45,99 €![An Ecosystem Services Approach to Assessing the Impacts of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico]( "An Ecosystem Services Approach to Assessing the Impacts of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico")
An Ecosystem Services Approach to Assessing the Impacts of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico66,99 €![Refinements to the Methods for Developing Spacecraft Exposure Guidelines]( "Refinements to the Methods for Developing Spacecraft Exposure Guidelines")
Refinements to the Methods for Developing Spacecraft Exposure Guidelines32,99 €![Review of the Environmental Protection Agency's Draft Iris Assessment of Formaldehyde]( "Review of the Environmental Protection Agency's Draft Iris Assessment of Formaldehyde")
Review of the Environmental Protection Agency's Draft Iris Assessment of Formaldehyde52,99 €![Advice on the Department of Energy's Cleanup Technology Roadmap]( "Advice on the Department of Energy's Cleanup Technology Roadmap")
Advice on the Department of Energy's Cleanup Technology Roadmap89,99 €
Potential health effects from chemicals that disrupt endocrine function pose an environmental health concern because of their ability to interfere with normal hormone function in human and wildlife populations. The endocrine system regulates biological processes throughout the body and is sensitive to small changes in hormone concentrations. Endocrine-disruptor research has focused primarily on chemicals that affect three hormone pathways that play important roles in reproduction and development - the estrogen, androgen, and thyroid hormone pathways. Some of this research has identified dose-response relationships that have nonmonotonic curves. Nonmonotonic dose-response curves (NMDRs) are of concern because they do not follow the usual assumption made in toxicology that as dose decreases the response also decreases. The existence of NMDRs has been a controversial topic for decades, and there has been considerable debate about their implications for how chemicals are tested and for how risks from such chemicals are assessed. Toxicity tests are designed to identify hazards and to characterize dose-response relationships, so tests are aimed at finding a (high) dose that elicits a response, and dose-response is explored by testing lower doses spaced to identify statistically a no- or lowest-observed-adverse-effect level. The concern for NMDRs is that such studies, as currently designed, might not detect the inflection of the dose-response curve if only a few doses are tested or if the change in inflection occurs below the range of doses tested. Another concern is that some NMDRs are found for biological effects that are not usually evaluated in toxicity tests. If current testing strategies are inadequate to account for NMDRs, changes to risk assessment practices might be necessary. To help address these issues, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed a draft State-of-the-Science Evaluation: Nonmonotonic Dose Responses as they Apply to Estrogen, Androgen, and Thyroid Pathways and EPA Testing and Assessment Procedures. EPA asked the National Research Council to conduct an independent review of this evaluation to ensure that it is scientifically sound and of high quality. Review of Environmental Protection Agency's State-of-the-Science Evaluation of Nonmonotonic Dose-Response as they Apply to Endocrine Disrupters evaluates whether EPA's evaluation presents a scientifically sound and high-quality analysis of the literature on NMDRs. This report reviews how well the EPA evaluation described how the assessment was performed, whether consistent methods and criteria were applied in the analysis of different evidence streams, and whether appropriate methods were applied to evaluating the evidence. The report makes recommendations to improve EPA's process and strengthen the evaluation.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.