Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Angry Abolitionists and the Rhetoric of Slavery]( "Angry Abolitionists and the Rhetoric of Slavery")
Angry Abolitionists and the Rhetoric of Slavery74,99 €![Rousseau, Aristoteles und die juristische Entscheidung]( "Rousseau, Aristoteles und die juristische Entscheidung")
Rousseau, Aristoteles und die juristische Entscheidung39,90 €![Rousseau, Aristote et la décision juridique]( "Rousseau, Aristote et la décision juridique")
Rousseau, Aristote et la décision juridique26,99 €![Rousseau, Aristotele e la decisione giuridica]( "Rousseau, Aristotele e la decisione giuridica")
Rousseau, Aristotele e la decisione giuridica26,99 €![Addressing the Weaknesses of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods using Python]( "Addressing the Weaknesses of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods using Python")
Addressing the Weaknesses of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods using Python24,95 €![The Classical Foundations of Population Thought]( "The Classical Foundations of Population Thought")
The Classical Foundations of Population Thought74,99 €![ICT for Dialogue and Inclusive Decision-Making]( "ICT for Dialogue and Inclusive Decision-Making")
ICT for Dialogue and Inclusive Decision-Making50,85 €
Analysing ADI 3510, more specifically Justice Marco Aurélio's vote in the case, showed the impact of these two characteristics of rhetoric: the doubt that hung over the issue (which could not be readily answered in the legal sphere) could be circumvented using arguments from spheres other than the legal sphere, thus creating a decision that was not certain and absolute, but plausible. This is an exemplary case of the importance of rhetoric today, after the angry criticism it has received throughout history.