Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Is our Prosperity a Delusion?]( "Is our Prosperity a Delusion?")
Is our Prosperity a Delusion?13,90 €![National Rectitude the Only True Basis of National Prosperity]( "National Rectitude the Only True Basis of National Prosperity")
National Rectitude the Only True Basis of National Prosperity12,90 €![The Prosperity of the South Dependent Upon the Elevation of the Negro]( "The Prosperity of the South Dependent Upon the Elevation of the Negro")
The Prosperity of the South Dependent Upon the Elevation of the Negro17,90 €![Tourism and Prosperity in Miao Land]( "Tourism and Prosperity in Miao Land")
Tourism and Prosperity in Miao Land49,99 €![Dollars Want Me, The New Road To Opulence]( "Dollars Want Me, The New Road To Opulence")
Dollars Want Me, The New Road To Opulence26,99 €![Prosperity and Politics]( "Prosperity and Politics")
Prosperity and Politics17,90 €![Manufacturing Green Prosperity]( "Manufacturing Green Prosperity")
Manufacturing Green Prosperity62,99 €
Society centred interpretations of social capital
are inadequate to explain the economic fortunes and
social prosperity of rural Australian communities.
This research sought to assess the relationship
between different interpretations of social capital
and rural communities resilience and prosperity.
The primary objective was to test the association
asserted between levels of social capital and
prosperity and resilience in the rural Australian
context.
The research highlights three notable issues.
Surveying social capital with society-centred
approaches is only effective in establishing the well
being of communities which relates to their
resilience, not an ability to prosper. Secondly, the
responsibilities for social capital generation
adopted by governments dictates the manner and degree
to which they acknowledge and utilise bridging and
linking networks, affecting the role social capital
is perceived to play in communities. Lastly, while
social capital is regarded as a normative social
factor, rather than being comprised of different and
dynamic elements affecting communities ability to
prosper, the concept will remain unable to
effectively contribute to the policy domain.
are inadequate to explain the economic fortunes and
social prosperity of rural Australian communities.
This research sought to assess the relationship
between different interpretations of social capital
and rural communities resilience and prosperity.
The primary objective was to test the association
asserted between levels of social capital and
prosperity and resilience in the rural Australian
context.
The research highlights three notable issues.
Surveying social capital with society-centred
approaches is only effective in establishing the well
being of communities which relates to their
resilience, not an ability to prosper. Secondly, the
responsibilities for social capital generation
adopted by governments dictates the manner and degree
to which they acknowledge and utilise bridging and
linking networks, affecting the role social capital
is perceived to play in communities. Lastly, while
social capital is regarded as a normative social
factor, rather than being comprised of different and
dynamic elements affecting communities ability to
prosper, the concept will remain unable to
effectively contribute to the policy domain.