Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Russia, China and the Revisionist Assault on the Western Liberal International Order]( "Russia, China and the Revisionist Assault on the Western Liberal International Order")
Russia, China and the Revisionist Assault on the Western Liberal International Order103,99 €![Liquid Sovereignty: Post-Colonial Statehood of China and India in the New International Order]( "Liquid Sovereignty: Post-Colonial Statehood of China and India in the New International Order")
Liquid Sovereignty: Post-Colonial Statehood of China and India in the New International Order88,99 €![The Story of International Relations, Part One]( "The Story of International Relations, Part One")
The Story of International Relations, Part One74,99 €![The Story of International Relations, Part One]( "The Story of International Relations, Part One")
The Story of International Relations, Part One74,99 €![The Wrecking of the Liberal World Order]( "The Wrecking of the Liberal World Order")
The Wrecking of the Liberal World Order103,99 €![The Wrecking of the Liberal World Order]( "The Wrecking of the Liberal World Order")
The Wrecking of the Liberal World Order103,99 €![Russia, China and the West in the Post-Cold War Era]( "Russia, China and the West in the Post-Cold War Era")
Russia, China and the West in the Post-Cold War Era81,99 €
This book analyzes Russian and Chinese revisionism in the face of US and Western post-Cold War liberal international order building and asks why both powers have turned revisionist in the late 2000s. The study develops a neoclassical realist model of international order building and contestation and posits to view revisionism as a strategic choice. States go revisionist if the status quo international order threatens their vital security needs (broadly defined not only as territorial security, but also political, economic, normative and ontological) and if they have the means to challenge the undesirable status quo. Russia and China were both unhappy with the post-Cold War international order of American designs, but had to opt for accommodation in the 1990s and early 2000s ("strategic accommodation" in the Chinese case, "resentful accommodation" in the Russian case), before revisionism became even more of a necessity and a real policy option from the late 2000s onward ("constructive revisionism" in the Chinese case, "destructive revisionism" in the Russian case). The author calls for a policy of neo-containment to counter Moscow's and Beijing's efforts to game and erode the international order.
"Based on her neo-classical realist model, Groitl convincingly argues that it is not the survival of states per se that dominates their international strategies, but the survival of their political systems. It would be fascinating to apply this framework to the US and European states ... . most of the empirical terrain covered in the book is well known to observers of global politics, the lens on regime security provides a compelling perspective that also holds relevant lessons for policy-makers." (Hubert Zimmermann, International Affairs, Vol. 100 (3), 2024)