Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Georgia and the European Union labour migration policy:]( "Georgia and the European Union labour migration policy:")
Georgia and the European Union labour migration policy:35,99 €![Europeanization of Language Rights in Russia and Ukraine]( "Europeanization of Language Rights in Russia and Ukraine")
Europeanization of Language Rights in Russia and Ukraine56,99 €![Mezhdunarodno-prawowoe regulirowanie]( "Mezhdunarodno-prawowoe regulirowanie")
Mezhdunarodno-prawowoe regulirowanie38,99 €![Counsel in the Caucasus: Professionalization and Law in Georgia]( "Counsel in the Caucasus: Professionalization and Law in Georgia")
Counsel in the Caucasus: Professionalization and Law in Georgia42,99 €![Termination of the Treaty of 1832 Between the United States and Russia]( "Termination of the Treaty of 1832 Between the United States and Russia")
Termination of the Treaty of 1832 Between the United States and Russia39,99 €![Memoir On The Megatherium And Other Extinct Gigantic Quadrupeds Of The Coast Of Georgia (1846)]( "Memoir On The Megatherium And Other Extinct Gigantic Quadrupeds Of The Coast Of Georgia (1846)")
Memoir On The Megatherium And Other Extinct Gigantic Quadrupeds Of The Coast Of Georgia (1846)30,99 €![Georgia Public Finance Law Handbook]( "Georgia Public Finance Law Handbook")
Georgia Public Finance Law Handbook56,99 €
In the contemporary world it has been widely upheld that human rights norms and standards have come to play a distinctive role in international life. However, the war of August 2008 between Russia and Georgia has demonstrated that the gap between the promise and the practice of human rights still remains huge. The analysis of the Russia-Georgia conflict nature and its dynamic leads to the major conclusions that, though the human rights regime has grown to the extent that it became almost impossible to ignore its importance in contemporary international relations, the persistence of human rights abuses, double standards and selectivity in human rights interventionism point to the gap between rhetoric and reality. The international human rights regime is political in practice though its intentions are idealistic. It responds pragmatically to circumstances and consequently often operates inconsistently. While the human rights institutions are essentially impartial, they are procedurally restricted and diplomatically cautious.