Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![A Future North American Defense Arrangement: Applying a Canadian Defense Policy Process Model]( "A Future North American Defense Arrangement: Applying a Canadian Defense Policy Process Model")
A Future North American Defense Arrangement: Applying a Canadian Defense Policy Process Model60,99 €![Japanese Military Development: Expressed Threats Versus Programs and Policies]( "Japanese Military Development: Expressed Threats Versus Programs and Policies")
Japanese Military Development: Expressed Threats Versus Programs and Policies60,99 €![Integrating Coexistent Combat and Conventional Airspace Within Contingency Areas]( "Integrating Coexistent Combat and Conventional Airspace Within Contingency Areas")
Integrating Coexistent Combat and Conventional Airspace Within Contingency Areas60,99 €![Special Operations and Conventional Forces: How to Improve Unity of Effort using Afghanistan as a Case Study]( "Special Operations and Conventional Forces: How to Improve Unity of Effort using Afghanistan as a Case Study")
Special Operations and Conventional Forces: How to Improve Unity of Effort using Afghanistan as a Case Study60,99 €![The Future of the Afghan Model: Unconventional Application of Conventional Counterland Doctrine]( "The Future of the Afghan Model: Unconventional Application of Conventional Counterland Doctrine")
The Future of the Afghan Model: Unconventional Application of Conventional Counterland Doctrine61,99 €![Overland Supply in Arctic Regions]( "Overland Supply in Arctic Regions")
Overland Supply in Arctic Regions60,99 €![Airpower and Gradual Escalation: Reconsidering the Conventional Wisdom]( "Airpower and Gradual Escalation: Reconsidering the Conventional Wisdom")
Airpower and Gradual Escalation: Reconsidering the Conventional Wisdom61,99 €
The effects of climate change as well as national interests over control of vast amounts of natural resources in the Arctic seem to be destabilizing the geostrategic environment involving the circumpolar states. A traditional conflict scenario in the near future is not out of the question, particularly if the legal framework governing the region, the United Nations Law of the Sea Treaty, is proved inadequate to address the full range of issues in the region and fails to resolve territorial claims. Canada has ongoing disputes in the Arctic region with the United States, Russia, and Denmark, and has recently reaffirmed its commitment to its national sovereignty. Based on an analysis of military capabilities for Arctic operations as well as a qualitative comparison between each of these countries, this study establishes that Canada does not have the necessary military capabilities to deter and counter conventional threats to its sovereignty in the Arctic. Consequently, Canada should leverage the other means of national power, specifically its existing multilateral security and defense agreements, to ensure its sovereignty in the Arctic.