Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![VFR Travel: An assessment of VFR versus non-VFR travellers]( "VFR Travel: An assessment of VFR versus non-VFR travellers")
VFR Travel: An assessment of VFR versus non-VFR travellers53,99 €![Effects of Return Commission]( "Effects of Return Commission")
Effects of Return Commission33,99 €![Consumer Attitude towards Online versus In-Store Shopping in Delhi NCR]( "Consumer Attitude towards Online versus In-Store Shopping in Delhi NCR")
Consumer Attitude towards Online versus In-Store Shopping in Delhi NCR65,99 €![Marketing Management. A study of consumer perceptions of value in relation to the Blackberry product versus the iPhone]( "Marketing Management. A study of consumer perceptions of value in relation to the Blackberry product versus the iPhone")
Marketing Management. A study of consumer perceptions of value in relation to the Blackberry product versus the iPhone18,95 €![Analysis of the article]( "Analysis of the article")
Analysis of the article "Word of Mouth versus Word of Mouse. Speaking about a Brand Connects You to It More Than Writing Does"18,95 €![FINANCIAL SERVICES]( "FINANCIAL SERVICES")
FINANCIAL SERVICES53,99 €![DSL versus Kabel]( "DSL versus Kabel")
DSL versus Kabel69,99 €
This book reports a study of universal life
insurance as a case study for analyzing the tradeoff
of selling commission against product performance,
using policies that have the feature of varying
sales commission by using a noncommissionable term
rider in the policy. This study first looks at
whether the use of the term rider has a
statistically significant effect on the policy''s
performance over the long term. The study reveals
no statistcal significance, when measured against
other independent variables. The study then
performs a discounted cash flow analysis of four
different case profiles to determine what
improvements in performance a policyholder could
expect given various degrees of commission
reduction. The results indicate that there is a
tradeoff, but predictability is problemmatic. The
study is a cautionary tale to agents and clients who
assume any predictable result from commission
reductions in these products, and leaves the reader
with the question: Who then is getting the better
part of the negotiation over commissions in these
products? The agent, the client, or the insurance
carrier itself?
insurance as a case study for analyzing the tradeoff
of selling commission against product performance,
using policies that have the feature of varying
sales commission by using a noncommissionable term
rider in the policy. This study first looks at
whether the use of the term rider has a
statistically significant effect on the policy''s
performance over the long term. The study reveals
no statistcal significance, when measured against
other independent variables. The study then
performs a discounted cash flow analysis of four
different case profiles to determine what
improvements in performance a policyholder could
expect given various degrees of commission
reduction. The results indicate that there is a
tradeoff, but predictability is problemmatic. The
study is a cautionary tale to agents and clients who
assume any predictable result from commission
reductions in these products, and leaves the reader
with the question: Who then is getting the better
part of the negotiation over commissions in these
products? The agent, the client, or the insurance
carrier itself?