Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The feminisation of public relations]( "The feminisation of public relations")
The feminisation of public relations51,99 €![Indigenous Societies and Cultural Globalization in the 21st Century]( "Indigenous Societies and Cultural Globalization in the 21st Century")
Indigenous Societies and Cultural Globalization in the 21st Century51,99 €![In the Wake of the Sleeping Dragon]( "In the Wake of the Sleeping Dragon")
In the Wake of the Sleeping Dragon32,99 €![Loving the Cool:]( "Loving the Cool:")
Loving the Cool:38,99 €![The Rhetoric of the Comment Box]( "The Rhetoric of the Comment Box")
The Rhetoric of the Comment Box44,99 €![The Climate Change Controversy]( "The Climate Change Controversy")
The Climate Change Controversy32,99 €![The Trials of Oscar Wilde]( "The Trials of Oscar Wilde")
The Trials of Oscar Wilde32,99 €
This qualitative study draws on and extends two
important concepts of the public understanding of
science literature: scientists understandings of the public , and the currently popular notion of
science-public dialogue. Using data from interviews
with scientists and engineers, the 'understanding of
the public by scientists is examined. Constructions
of publics are also an emphasis in a detailed case
study of informal science-public dialogue at the Dana
Centre, London. Here structures of power and
authority are more traditional than the dialogue
movement s rhetoric would suggest, but there is also
continual resistance to and contestation of these
structures. To conclude, the threads of analysis are
drawn together to provide a theoretical reasoning of,
and model for, informal dialogue processes which are
able to utilise the sociological complexity of
scientists talk.
important concepts of the public understanding of
science literature: scientists understandings of the public , and the currently popular notion of
science-public dialogue. Using data from interviews
with scientists and engineers, the 'understanding of
the public by scientists is examined. Constructions
of publics are also an emphasis in a detailed case
study of informal science-public dialogue at the Dana
Centre, London. Here structures of power and
authority are more traditional than the dialogue
movement s rhetoric would suggest, but there is also
continual resistance to and contestation of these
structures. To conclude, the threads of analysis are
drawn together to provide a theoretical reasoning of,
and model for, informal dialogue processes which are
able to utilise the sociological complexity of
scientists talk.