Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Philosophie des Films]( "Philosophie des Films")
Philosophie des Films34,90 €![Kunst und Kunstbegriff]( "Kunst und Kunstbegriff")
Kunst und Kunstbegriff34,90 €![Kunst denken]( "Kunst denken")
Kunst denken56,00 €![Kunst als Selbstverständigung]( "Kunst als Selbstverständigung")
Kunst als Selbstverständigung49,90 €![Prozesse und Funktionen des Erkennens in Ästhetischer Erfahrung]( "Prozesse und Funktionen des Erkennens in Ästhetischer Erfahrung")
Prozesse und Funktionen des Erkennens in Ästhetischer Erfahrung42,90 €![Kunst, Fiktion und Moral]( "Kunst, Fiktion und Moral")
Kunst, Fiktion und Moral66,00 €![Architekturphilosophie - Grundlagentexte]( "Architekturphilosophie - Grundlagentexte")
Architekturphilosophie - Grundlagentexte34,90 €
"See What I Mean Understanding Films as Communicative Actions" contributes to the theoretical foundations of film philosophy. It is the application of an intention-based semantics to films.
An intention-based semantics describes the meaning of words as their speaker-intended use. This facilitates a pre-conventional definition of communicative actions on the token-level. It makes the individualist, action-theoretical model of communication apt for an application to other communicative contexts, such as films.
The book applies H.P.Grice s theory of meaning and Georg Meggle s extension of the Gricean model to films. Film-philosophical questions concerning film-understanding, truth of films, the cognitive value of films, the relationship of films and reality and their intentionality are discussed.
Studies in film semiotics attempt to understand films via their Language-likeness . These approaches typically fail to show the discrete, arbitrary and conventional units of films which function as non-naturally meaningful signs analogous to the functioning of words in a natural Language. See What I Mean reintroduces the question of Language-likeness and finds an answer: films are not like natural Languages, but films and natural Languages are alike they are both used for communicative purposes.
In this book, films are considered to be a special class of moving images; they are intentional, visual artifacts with the main goal of communication. The text is a critique on film realism and discursive film theories; it asks the reader to consider films as communicative actions in the world. Understood as such, films fit into the social reality as John R. Searle reconstructs it: With films we negotiate and change this social reality.
Films are communicative attempts of a speaker directed towards a spectator; they are directives of the form: "Look at the world in this way!"
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
An intention-based semantics describes the meaning of words as their speaker-intended use. This facilitates a pre-conventional definition of communicative actions on the token-level. It makes the individualist, action-theoretical model of communication apt for an application to other communicative contexts, such as films.
The book applies H.P.Grice s theory of meaning and Georg Meggle s extension of the Gricean model to films. Film-philosophical questions concerning film-understanding, truth of films, the cognitive value of films, the relationship of films and reality and their intentionality are discussed.
Studies in film semiotics attempt to understand films via their Language-likeness . These approaches typically fail to show the discrete, arbitrary and conventional units of films which function as non-naturally meaningful signs analogous to the functioning of words in a natural Language. See What I Mean reintroduces the question of Language-likeness and finds an answer: films are not like natural Languages, but films and natural Languages are alike they are both used for communicative purposes.
In this book, films are considered to be a special class of moving images; they are intentional, visual artifacts with the main goal of communication. The text is a critique on film realism and discursive film theories; it asks the reader to consider films as communicative actions in the world. Understood as such, films fit into the social reality as John R. Searle reconstructs it: With films we negotiate and change this social reality.
Films are communicative attempts of a speaker directed towards a spectator; they are directives of the form: "Look at the world in this way!"
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.