Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Opening Argument for the United States in Rebuttal in the Case of Fitz-John Porter]( "Opening Argument for the United States in Rebuttal in the Case of Fitz-John Porter")
Opening Argument for the United States in Rebuttal in the Case of Fitz-John Porter13,90 €![Reply to the Argument of Nicaragua]( "Reply to the Argument of Nicaragua")
Reply to the Argument of Nicaragua21,90 €![Argument of J.H. Benton, Jr., Esq.,]( "Argument of J.H. Benton, Jr., Esq.,")
Argument of J.H. Benton, Jr., Esq.,12,90 €![An Argument in the Case of James Sommersett a Negro, Lately Determined by the Court of King's Bench]( "An Argument in the Case of James Sommersett a Negro, Lately Determined by the Court of King's Bench")
An Argument in the Case of James Sommersett a Negro, Lately Determined by the Court of King's Bench13,90 €![Argument Made Before a Joint Committee]( "Argument Made Before a Joint Committee")
Argument Made Before a Joint Committee12,90 €![The Winning Argument in the Legal Tender Case of 1884]( "The Winning Argument in the Legal Tender Case of 1884")
The Winning Argument in the Legal Tender Case of 188412,90 €![Justice, Law, and Argument]( "Justice, Law, and Argument")
Justice, Law, and Argument40,99 €
Self-referencing doomsday argument rebuttals attempt to refute the Doomsday argument (that there is a credible link between the brevity of the human race's existence and its expected extinction) by applying the same reasoning to the lifetime of the Doomsday argument (DA) itself. The first researchers to write about this were P. T. Landsberg and J. N. Dewynne in 1997; they applied belief in the DA to itself, and claimed that a paradox results.