Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Oral Traditional Background of Ancient Greek Literature]( "The Oral Traditional Background of Ancient Greek Literature")
The Oral Traditional Background of Ancient Greek Literature258,99 €![Intellectual Politics and Cultural Conflict in the Romantic Period]( "Intellectual Politics and Cultural Conflict in the Romantic Period")
Intellectual Politics and Cultural Conflict in the Romantic Period204,99 €![The Working-Class Intellectual in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain]( "The Working-Class Intellectual in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain")
The Working-Class Intellectual in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain205,99 €![The Constitution of Shelley's Poetry]( "The Constitution of Shelley's Poetry")
The Constitution of Shelley's Poetry117,99 €![Originality and Intellectual Property in the French and English Enlightenment]( "Originality and Intellectual Property in the French and English Enlightenment")
Originality and Intellectual Property in the French and English Enlightenment215,99 €![Shelley's Satire]( "Shelley's Satire")
Shelley's Satire29,99 €![Expressive Voice Culture, Including the Emerson System]( "Expressive Voice Culture, Including the Emerson System")
Expressive Voice Culture, Including the Emerson System17,99 €
Scholars do not agree on how best to describe Shelley's philosophical stance. His work has been variously taken to be that of a skeptic or a skeptical and subjective idealist. The study presents a new interpretation of Shelley's thinking - an interpretation that places 'intellectual system' squarely within the Epicurean tradition of Lucretius, casting both poets as theistic empiricists. To establish Shelley as working in the Epicurean tradition, this study explores Lucretius' De Rerum Natura as edited, translated and interpreted by two Epicurean scholars roughly contemporary with Shelley: Gilbert Wakefield and John Mason Good. These scholars rehabilitated Lucretius by drawing on three major seventeenth-century thinkers, Pierre Gassendi, Ralph Cudworth and Nicholas Malebranche. Like Shelley, each of these thinkers rejected the reduction of philosophy to mechanical and atomistic elements, a reduction which Shelley referred to as 'materialism' or 'popular dualism'. What Shelley rejected is a clue to what he embraced: a fusion of Enlightenment Rationalism with British Empiricism. Such a fusion is the distinguishing mark of the work of Sir William Drummond, the only contemporary philosopher that Shelley consistently praised. This is the tradition within which Shelley ultimately stands - one that brings into balance what is given to the mind a priori and what the mind creates.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.