Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Salammbo of Gustave Flaubert]( "Salammbo of Gustave Flaubert")
Salammbo of Gustave Flaubert30,90 €![Le port d'attache de Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio]( "Le port d'attache de Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio")
Le port d'attache de Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio38,99 €![Filling the Silence]( "Filling the Silence")
Filling the Silence32,99 €![Echoes From the Abyss of Silence]( "Echoes From the Abyss of Silence")
Echoes From the Abyss of Silence32,99 €![The Sound of Silence]( "The Sound of Silence")
The Sound of Silence32,99 €![The archaeology of writing in Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio]( "The archaeology of writing in Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio")
The archaeology of writing in Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio39,99 €![Gender, Participation and Silence in the Language Classroom]( "Gender, Participation and Silence in the Language Classroom")
Gender, Participation and Silence in the Language Classroom74,99 €
Recent studies have introduced the idea that silence
is not the goal of Flaubert s language but a way to
reclaim language from society. Through study of
Kraus s use of citationality, Flaubert s use of
silence in his citational method becomes explicit.
In both authors there is a clear distinction between
language that is self-aware, that interacts with all
possible meanings; and language that is unaware,
where alternate meanings can disrupt the author s
intention. What emerges is an aesthetics of language
that relies on its historical and literary
etymology, as well as a highly idiosyncratic idea
about the function of grammar that reaffirms it as
the form-giving principle of language. It is thanks
to citationality as understood in contemporary
performance studies that we are able to see the
similarities in Flaubert s and Kraus s writing,
and
much more poignantly, the subversive aesthetic and
political potential of that writing. Citationality
becomes the driving process behind both authors
creative methods - but in a form that, while
coinciding with Derrida and Butler s uses of the
term, is unique to each writer.
is not the goal of Flaubert s language but a way to
reclaim language from society. Through study of
Kraus s use of citationality, Flaubert s use of
silence in his citational method becomes explicit.
In both authors there is a clear distinction between
language that is self-aware, that interacts with all
possible meanings; and language that is unaware,
where alternate meanings can disrupt the author s
intention. What emerges is an aesthetics of language
that relies on its historical and literary
etymology, as well as a highly idiosyncratic idea
about the function of grammar that reaffirms it as
the form-giving principle of language. It is thanks
to citationality as understood in contemporary
performance studies that we are able to see the
similarities in Flaubert s and Kraus s writing,
and
much more poignantly, the subversive aesthetic and
political potential of that writing. Citationality
becomes the driving process behind both authors
creative methods - but in a form that, while
coinciding with Derrida and Butler s uses of the
term, is unique to each writer.