Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Niels Bohr]( "Niels Bohr")
Niels Bohr128,39 €![Niels Bohr]( "Niels Bohr")
Niels Bohr88,99 €![The Nature of the Physical World]( "The Nature of the Physical World")
The Nature of the Physical World22,99 €![Fundamentals]( "Fundamentals")
Fundamentals9,49 €![Quantum Questions]( "Quantum Questions")
Quantum Questions20,99 €![Erwin Schrodinger and the Quantum Revolution]( "Erwin Schrodinger and the Quantum Revolution")
Erwin Schrodinger and the Quantum Revolution28,99 €![Real Life After Life]( "Real Life After Life")
Real Life After Life14,99 €
A new interpretation of quantum physics:For 100 years, most physicists have believed that it is no longer possible to understand the true constitution of nature. This is due to the unresolved wave-particle paradox, the apparent contradiction between wholeness and divisibility - that subtle smile of Nature that seemed so confusing that theoretical physics threw in the towel in despair as early as 1927. This was a direct consequence of the Copenhagen Interpretation, in which Niels Bohr had postulated an insurmountable barrier of cognition (at least for physicists).In reality, however, the underlying experiments are of a poignant simplicity that even laymen can understand: They reveal holistic division and branching processes of matter and light. This fact refutes the atomic hypothesis, the hypothesis of indivisibility, on which our current world view is based. This is precisely the fundamental natural philosophical problem of physics: although the experiment clearly proves that the2400-year-old Greek idea of the existence of atoms - i.e. indivisible particles - cannot apply to nature and reality, we have not yet been able to understand the 'actual punchline of this joke' (Einstein): The key point is simply that physics, like biology, proves the existence of non-mechanical, i.e. holistic division processes, which requires a revolution of physics.Volume 1 introduces the quantum puzzle and identifies the four cognitive problems of quantum physics. They are obviously caused by assumptions that are considered proven, but must nevertheless be false. So we embark on a detective search for clues in the history of ideas in 19th century physics. The investigation reveals, among other things, that the indivisibility hypothesis already failed experimentally justified in the founding days of chemistry, which led Avogadro to the hypothesis of divisible 'atoms', called integral molecules. If we now interpret this divisibility as molecular cell division, the atomic concept becomes obsolete - not only in classical physics and chemistry, but also in quantum theory.