Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Soviet Policy Toward Israel Under Gorbachev]( "Soviet Policy Toward Israel Under Gorbachev")
Soviet Policy Toward Israel Under Gorbachev28,99 €![Soviet Policy Toward East Germany Reconsidered]( "Soviet Policy Toward East Germany Reconsidered")
Soviet Policy Toward East Germany Reconsidered95,99 €![Soviet Policy Toward Israel Under Gorbachev]( "Soviet Policy Toward Israel Under Gorbachev")
Soviet Policy Toward Israel Under Gorbachev76,99 €![Toward Genuine Global Governance]( "Toward Genuine Global Governance")
Toward Genuine Global Governance96,99 €![The Hero's Journey Toward a Second American Century]( "The Hero's Journey Toward a Second American Century")
The Hero's Journey Toward a Second American Century95,99 €![China's Foreign Policy Toward the Third World.]( "China's Foreign Policy Toward the Third World.")
China's Foreign Policy Toward the Third World.28,99 €![United States Foreign Policy Toward Africa]( "United States Foreign Policy Toward Africa")
United States Foreign Policy Toward Africa125,99 €
This study is the first significant work to examine Soviet involvement with national liberation movements (NLMs) in Africa as a separate subcategory of Soviet foreign policy in the developing world. The text compares and contrasts actual Soviet behavior with declared policy. Daniel R. Kempton presents three case studies: the African National Congress (ANC) in South Africa, The Movimento Popular de Libertacao de Angola (MPLA) and the Zimbabwe African People's Union (ZAPU). These cases trace the development of the Soviet Union's ties to the national liberation movements, the amount and types of assistance provided, and the impact of the relationship on the national liberation movements. General analysts of international relations, analysts of Soviet foreign policy and Africanists will find this a valuable resource. The author contends that during the 1960s and 1970s the Soviet Union pursued a common strategy toward all three national liberation movements. Although the strategy was applied flexibly to take into account the idiosyncracies of the individual liberation struggles, in each case the Soviet Union pushed the national liberation movement to adopt the Soviet political model. The Soviet view was that the adoption of this model would eventually lead to the development of relatively more stable and dependable allies. Since 1980, however, in each case there is significant evidence that the Soviet Union has altered markedly, if not abandoned, its previous strategy.