Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Institute of Attesting Witnesses in Russian Criminal Proceedings]( "Institute of Attesting Witnesses in Russian Criminal Proceedings")
Institute of Attesting Witnesses in Russian Criminal Proceedings27,99 €![The Victims' Reparation Scheme of the Special Criminal Court]( "The Victims' Reparation Scheme of the Special Criminal Court")
The Victims' Reparation Scheme of the Special Criminal Court51,99 €![Criminal liability of women under Russian law]( "Criminal liability of women under Russian law")
Criminal liability of women under Russian law44,99 €![Wrongful bankruptcy in Russian criminal law]( "Wrongful bankruptcy in Russian criminal law")
Wrongful bankruptcy in Russian criminal law44,99 €![Expert Evidence as a Means of Proof in Criminal Proceedings]( "Expert Evidence as a Means of Proof in Criminal Proceedings")
Expert Evidence as a Means of Proof in Criminal Proceedings26,99 €![Victim and private prosecutor as participants in criminal proceedings]( "Victim and private prosecutor as participants in criminal proceedings")
Victim and private prosecutor as participants in criminal proceedings26,99 €![Pre-trial detention in criminal proceedings]( "Pre-trial detention in criminal proceedings")
Pre-trial detention in criminal proceedings26,99 €
On the basis of the complex approach to the study of problems of using special knowledge as a criminal procedure institute, the author's concept of special knowledge in criminal proceedings is proposed, the difference between the concepts of "special knowledge" and "special knowledge" is argued, and the priority use of the concept of "special knowledge" is given. A comprehensive analysis of a specialist's procedural position and conclusion as a type of evidence in criminal proceedings was carried out, the possibility of using legal (legal) knowledge in Russian criminal proceedings was studied, and it was determined that a specialist does not carry out special research when giving a conclusion.