Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Air Commander in the Solomons Campaign: Unrivaled Unity of Effort in Joint Air Operations]( "The Air Commander in the Solomons Campaign: Unrivaled Unity of Effort in Joint Air Operations")
The Air Commander in the Solomons Campaign: Unrivaled Unity of Effort in Joint Air Operations64,99 €![Shared Knowledge Is Power: Seeking Unity of Effort in Influence Operations]( "Shared Knowledge Is Power: Seeking Unity of Effort in Influence Operations")
Shared Knowledge Is Power: Seeking Unity of Effort in Influence Operations64,99 €![Converging Forces: Achieving Unity of Purpose in Multinational Peace Operations]( "Converging Forces: Achieving Unity of Purpose in Multinational Peace Operations")
Converging Forces: Achieving Unity of Purpose in Multinational Peace Operations64,99 €![United Nations Operation in Somalia II: United Nations Unity of Effort and United States Unity of Command]( "United Nations Operation in Somalia II: United Nations Unity of Effort and United States Unity of Command")
United Nations Operation in Somalia II: United Nations Unity of Effort and United States Unity of Command63,99 €![Achieving Unity of Effort at the Operational Level Through the Interagency Process]( "Achieving Unity of Effort at the Operational Level Through the Interagency Process")
Achieving Unity of Effort at the Operational Level Through the Interagency Process63,99 €![Organizational Imperative: Theory and History on Unity of Effort in Counterinsurgency Campaigns]( "Organizational Imperative: Theory and History on Unity of Effort in Counterinsurgency Campaigns")
Organizational Imperative: Theory and History on Unity of Effort in Counterinsurgency Campaigns63,99 €![American War Strategy: Restoring Coherence and Unity of Effort]( "American War Strategy: Restoring Coherence and Unity of Effort")
American War Strategy: Restoring Coherence and Unity of Effort63,99 €
The purpose of this monograph is to offer some practical solutions to building unity of effort between Special Operations Forces (SOF) and conventional forces using operations in Afghanistan from 2001 until 2009 as a case study. In researching U.S. legal code and U.S. Armed Forces doctrine, it is clear that both the U.S. Congress and the various services intended all forces to work together towards a common end during operations. In the case of Afghanistan, it is apparent that three things complicated unity of effort between SOF and conventional forces: the lack of an Afghanistan campaign plan by USCENTCOM, the assignment of SOF under the operational control of the conventional force Joint Task Force from 2002 until 2006, and the difficulties of a transition to a NATO command structure in 2006. These complications affected both the activities on the battlefield and the synchronization of operational and strategic plans. This led to problems that included an atmosphere of mistrust and misunderstanding, support issues, conventional forces struggling to command and control SOF, unneeded restrictions on SOF, and personality conflicts that affected operations and synchronization. Several different possible solutions to improve unity of effort exist. They are: changing the command and control structure between SOF and conventional forces, nesting SOF operations and plans with the overall campaign plan, attempting to align the proper personalities with certain tasks and positions, educating and integrating SOF and conventional forces, aligning and empowering liaison officers more appropriately, and aligning SOF headquarters with conventional force headquarters as appropriate. The conclusion is that there are three imperatives to ensuring unity of effort between SOF and conventional forces. The first is to ensure that SOF operations and plans are nested with the overall theater campaign plan and if there is no overall theater campaign plan that SOF take the lead in its dev
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.