Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Economic and Military Development of China and Its Implications on U.S. National Security]( "The Economic and Military Development of China and Its Implications on U.S. National Security")
The Economic and Military Development of China and Its Implications on U.S. National Security63,99 €![Russian Military Reform from Perestroika to Putin: Implications for U.S. Policy]( "Russian Military Reform from Perestroika to Putin: Implications for U.S. Policy")
Russian Military Reform from Perestroika to Putin: Implications for U.S. Policy63,99 €![Commercial Eyes in Space: Implications for U.S. Military Operations in 2030]( "Commercial Eyes in Space: Implications for U.S. Military Operations in 2030")
Commercial Eyes in Space: Implications for U.S. Military Operations in 203061,99 €![U.S. Army Apache Helicopters and U.S. Air Force Expeditionary Forces: Implications for Future Military Operations]( "U.S. Army Apache Helicopters and U.S. Air Force Expeditionary Forces: Implications for Future Military Operations")
U.S. Army Apache Helicopters and U.S. Air Force Expeditionary Forces: Implications for Future Military Operations60,99 €![Strategic and Operational Implications of Iranian Military Operations in the Iran-Iraq War]( "Strategic and Operational Implications of Iranian Military Operations in the Iran-Iraq War")
Strategic and Operational Implications of Iranian Military Operations in the Iran-Iraq War63,99 €![Re-framing the United States/Mexico Border Violence Situation: Strategic Campaign Planning in Action]( "Re-framing the United States/Mexico Border Violence Situation: Strategic Campaign Planning in Action")
Re-framing the United States/Mexico Border Violence Situation: Strategic Campaign Planning in Action63,99 €![Can Two Person Zero Sum Game Theory Improve Military Decision-Making Course of Action Selection?]( "Can Two Person Zero Sum Game Theory Improve Military Decision-Making Course of Action Selection?")
Can Two Person Zero Sum Game Theory Improve Military Decision-Making Course of Action Selection?63,99 €
On 19 March 2011 President Barack Obama ordered the U.S. military to reinforce the Libyan opposition in the civil war against the 42 year old regime of Muammar al Qadhafi. Seven months later, the Qadhafi regime was a thing of the past. The President launched a successful unconventional war with NATO allies and Arab partners in support of an insurgency in an Arab country without the loss of a single U.S. life. It was a vindication of Obama#65533;s approach to the application of military power and a nice gain in political capital on the eve of election season. However, this war produced consequences that do not work in favor of U.S. interests. This paper analyzes the positive and negative implications of U.S. participation in the war in Libya, and measures them against the four pillars of the 2010 National Security Strategy. The author concludes that the long term negative aspects outweigh the short term positive results. In the end, the war in Libya brought greater harm than good to U.S. national security.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.