Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![A Study of English Romanticism and Sufism as Literary Movements]( "A Study of English Romanticism and Sufism as Literary Movements")
A Study of English Romanticism and Sufism as Literary Movements38,99 €![Poetry, Politics and Pictures]( "Poetry, Politics and Pictures")
Poetry, Politics and Pictures118,35 €![Syntactic and Semantic Features of English Compounds]( "Syntactic and Semantic Features of English Compounds")
Syntactic and Semantic Features of English Compounds16,95 €![Syntactic theory and first language acquisition]( "Syntactic theory and first language acquisition")
Syntactic theory and first language acquisition17,95 €![Hard to See, the Dark Side Is]( "Hard to See, the Dark Side Is")
Hard to See, the Dark Side Is17,95 €![Syntactic distinctions within present day English]( "Syntactic distinctions within present day English")
Syntactic distinctions within present day English17,95 €![The Syntactic Structure of Verb-Particle Constructions]( "The Syntactic Structure of Verb-Particle Constructions")
The Syntactic Structure of Verb-Particle Constructions17,95 €
Seminar paper from the year 2008 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 2.0, Technical University of Braunschweig, language: English, abstract: 1. IntroductionIn the course of this term paper I will analyze three kinds of syntactic movements, which will be the Head Movement, Argument Movement and the Wh-Movement.Initially I will defer to basic knowledge such as Feature Checking, Merge and C-Command since these operations are the basis of syntactic comprehension.After a short introduction I will briefly discuss and explain the Head Movement and the Argument Movement with the help of examples before I focus on the latter, namely the Wh-Movement. This syntactic operation will be the core of this paper. I will try to analyze the latest concepts and approaches to this issue and try to illustrate the way Wh-Movement takes place by several examples.I decided to concentrate on Adger's and Radford's points of view on this topic since they rate among the most accepted syntacticians worldwide. Despite this I will parse their statements very closely and try to find potential differences or grievances.An interesting question will be whether all operations can be explained in a plausible way or if there are arbitrary assumptions without any evidence.2. Feature CheckingSyntacticians assume that every word of a sentence bears certain features. These features are called categorial-selectional (or c-selectional) features and can be either interpretable or uninterpretable. A noun, for example, bears an interpretable feature [N], a verb [V], an adverbial [Adv] and a preposition the feature [P].A verb cannot stand alone in a sentence but it needs the existence of a subject. In order to explain this phenomenon linguists came to the assumption that a verb has to bear uninterpretable features as well.Since a verb needs the presence of a subject, which usually is a DP, it is assumed that the verb bears next to the interpretable feature [V] the uninterpretable feature [N] (abbreviated [uN]).2.1 MergeThis uninterpretable feature has to be checked and deleted in order to form a grammatically correct sentence. This happens via the operation of Merge. Merge can only