Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Supporting Forward in the Heavy Division: Do Sustainment Efforts Represent an Asset or a Liability to the Generation and Maintenance of Division Comba]( "Supporting Forward in the Heavy Division: Do Sustainment Efforts Represent an Asset or a Liability to the Generation and Maintenance of Division Comba")
Supporting Forward in the Heavy Division: Do Sustainment Efforts Represent an Asset or a Liability to the Generation and Maintenance of Division Comba61,99 €![ADA Battalion in the Heavy Division: Can It Provide the Necessary Support?]( "ADA Battalion in the Heavy Division: Can It Provide the Necessary Support?")
ADA Battalion in the Heavy Division: Can It Provide the Necessary Support?60,99 €![The Heavy Bomber Industrial Base: A Study of Present and Future Capabilities]( "The Heavy Bomber Industrial Base: A Study of Present and Future Capabilities")
The Heavy Bomber Industrial Base: A Study of Present and Future Capabilities60,99 €![Assessment of Bridging Requirements and Current Bridging Capabilities for use of Legacy Heavy Forces Inside the Contemporary Operational Environment]( "Assessment of Bridging Requirements and Current Bridging Capabilities for use of Legacy Heavy Forces Inside the Contemporary Operational Environment")
Assessment of Bridging Requirements and Current Bridging Capabilities for use of Legacy Heavy Forces Inside the Contemporary Operational Environment63,99 €![Behind the Myth of the Jungle Superman: A Tactical Examination of the Japanese Army's Centrifugal Offensive, 7 December 1941 to 20 May 1942]( "Behind the Myth of the Jungle Superman: A Tactical Examination of the Japanese Army's Centrifugal Offensive, 7 December 1941 to 20 May 1942")
Behind the Myth of the Jungle Superman: A Tactical Examination of the Japanese Army's Centrifugal Offensive, 7 December 1941 to 20 May 194263,99 €![Tactical Alchemy: Heavy Division Tactical Maneuver Planning Guides and the Army's Neglect of the Science of War]( "Tactical Alchemy: Heavy Division Tactical Maneuver Planning Guides and the Army's Neglect of the Science of War")
Tactical Alchemy: Heavy Division Tactical Maneuver Planning Guides and the Army's Neglect of the Science of War61,99 €![Heavy Brigade Combat Team in Coin: An Assessment of Capabilities to Clear-Hold-Build-And Sustain Success]( "Heavy Brigade Combat Team in Coin: An Assessment of Capabilities to Clear-Hold-Build-And Sustain Success")
Heavy Brigade Combat Team in Coin: An Assessment of Capabilities to Clear-Hold-Build-And Sustain Success63,99 €
This study examines tactical deception capabilities in the U.S. Army. The research question asks, "what should be the capabilities of the heavy division in Europe to perform tactical deception in defensive operations?" The study first analyzes the theory of deception from the writings of Mao, Sun Tzu, Clausewitz, Liddell Hart and Barton Whaley to determine what theory says our capabilities should be. Next, it traces the U.S. Army's development and use of deception from history. Theoretically and historically-derived capabilities to deceive at the tactical level are contrasted to current U.S. and Soviet doctrine. This background in theory, history and doctrine is then compared to contemporary evidence of U.S. tactical deception efforts of divisions employed in European REFORGER exercises. The final sections draw conclusions and implications concerning tactical deception in the U.S. Army, focusing upon the areas of doctrine, training, resources and command and staff processes. This study concludes there is a significant gap between what should be and what actually is a U.S. division's capability to perform tactical deception in the defense. Doctrinally, although the new FM 90-2 (draft) makes major improvements, our Army lacks an Army-level proponent for deception. Furthermore, deception doctrine is inconsistently incorporated into our general doctrine, and the relationship between surprise, deception and OPSEC remains unclear. Moreover, our doctrine does not specifically establish deception standards or capabilities in which divisions must be proficient. Second, the training and assignment of the 17-man deception element to division and corps will not be completed for two years. The study concludes that there are serious shortcomings of incorporating deception instruction within TRADOC institutions, tactical exercises and wargames at division level. Deception is not included in unit ARTEPS, METLs, or training guidance. Third, although the Army specifies future TAC-D
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.