51,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei*
Versandfertig in 6-10 Tagen
  • Broschiertes Buch

The elementary school teacher s personal understanding of science has not been a primary focus of consideration in reform discussions. The purpose of this study is to explore core understandings about science that are held by four elementary teachers, and to examine the origins of those ideas. The theoretical framework for this research recognizes three guiding assumptions: science exists as a set of ideas that have developed over time through competing discourses; teachers play an important role in the science curriculum; and the guiding influences of a teacher s understanding of science are…mehr

Produktbeschreibung
The elementary school teacher s personal
understanding of science has not been a primary focus
of consideration in reform discussions. The purpose
of this study is to explore core understandings about
science that are held by four elementary teachers,
and to examine the origins of those ideas. The
theoretical framework for this research recognizes
three guiding assumptions: science exists as a set of
ideas that have developed over time through competing
discourses; teachers play an important role in the
science curriculum; and the guiding influences of a
teacher s understanding of science are associated
with power. The finding of the study provides
evidence that the teachers science understanding is
unique and developed over time. This investigation
recommends that teachers personal understandings
become a focus in developing educational
opportunities for elementary school teachers. This
study further recommends challenging a hegemony
related to positivism that exists in science
curricula and the use of narrative inquiry as
a method of understanding teacher experiences.
Autorenporträt
Dr. Robert Price earned his doctorate in Curriculum and Teaching
from Teachers College, Columbia University and has been an
educator for over 20 years. It has been Dr. Price s educational
goal to improve curriculum and teaching through a critical
analysis of what we teach and why we teach it.