Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008]( "Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008")
Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-200813,99 €![The Canadian General Election of 2000]( "The Canadian General Election of 2000")
The Canadian General Election of 200022,99 €![The 1999 2000 Elections in Russia]( "The 1999 2000 Elections in Russia")
The 1999 2000 Elections in Russia27,99 €![Party Pursuits and the Presidential-House Election Connection, 1900-2008]( "Party Pursuits and the Presidential-House Election Connection, 1900-2008")
Party Pursuits and the Presidential-House Election Connection, 1900-200833,99 €![Was the 2004 Presidential Election Stolen?: Exit Polls, Election Fraud, and the Official Count]( "Was the 2004 Presidential Election Stolen?: Exit Polls, Election Fraud, and the Official Count")
Was the 2004 Presidential Election Stolen?: Exit Polls, Election Fraud, and the Official Count16,99 €![Understanding the 2000 Election]( "Understanding the 2000 Election")
Understanding the 2000 Election29,99 €![The Presidential Election Process]( "The Presidential Election Process")
The Presidential Election Process39,99 €
An examination of the US electoral process, providing an integrated account of the 2000 campaign.
In the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election, campaigns suddenly seem to matter, as do questions about the electoral process. Professors Johnston, Hagen and Jamieson have examined the US electoral process as an integrated event spanning a full year, drawing upon a data set that is massive in scale and novel in execution: the Annenberg 2000 Election Study. The scale of their fieldwork is such that they have been able to isolate key turning points and that dynamics can be studied within certain segments. The interviews are rich in opinion about policy, perception, information and judgement about candidates, media use and strategy. What is more, the authors have used candidate appearances, news coverage, and campaign advertising to provide the first integrated account of this or any US campaign.
Table of content:
Acknowledgements; 1. Introduction; 2. The evolution of vote intentions; 3. The landscape; 4. Ads and news: the campaign as a natural experiment; 5. The economy, Clinton and the first phase; 6. Candidate traits and the second phase; 7. Social security and the third phase; 8. Conclusions; Appendix; References; Index.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
In the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election, campaigns suddenly seem to matter, as do questions about the electoral process. Professors Johnston, Hagen and Jamieson have examined the US electoral process as an integrated event spanning a full year, drawing upon a data set that is massive in scale and novel in execution: the Annenberg 2000 Election Study. The scale of their fieldwork is such that they have been able to isolate key turning points and that dynamics can be studied within certain segments. The interviews are rich in opinion about policy, perception, information and judgement about candidates, media use and strategy. What is more, the authors have used candidate appearances, news coverage, and campaign advertising to provide the first integrated account of this or any US campaign.
Table of content:
Acknowledgements; 1. Introduction; 2. The evolution of vote intentions; 3. The landscape; 4. Ads and news: the campaign as a natural experiment; 5. The economy, Clinton and the first phase; 6. Candidate traits and the second phase; 7. Social security and the third phase; 8. Conclusions; Appendix; References; Index.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.