Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Alon the Archer in the Year 1626]( "Alon the Archer in the Year 1626")
Alon the Archer in the Year 162614,99 €![Erewhon Revisited Twenty Years Later, Both by the Original Discoverer of the Country and by His Son]( "Erewhon Revisited Twenty Years Later, Both by the Original Discoverer of the Country and by His Son")
Erewhon Revisited Twenty Years Later, Both by the Original Discoverer of the Country and by His Son69,90 €![The Archer]( "The Archer")
The Archer16,99 €![Erewhon Revisited Twenty Years Later, Both by the Original Discoverer of the Country and by His Son]( "Erewhon Revisited Twenty Years Later, Both by the Original Discoverer of the Country and by His Son")
Erewhon Revisited Twenty Years Later, Both by the Original Discoverer of the Country and by His Son49,90 €![Blues in the Wind-Revisited]( "Blues in the Wind-Revisited")
Blues in the Wind-Revisited29,99 €![John Gabriel Borkman, a Play in Four Acts. Translated From the Norwegian by William Archer]( "John Gabriel Borkman, a Play in Four Acts. Translated From the Norwegian by William Archer")
John Gabriel Borkman, a Play in Four Acts. Translated From the Norwegian by William Archer36,99 €![Brideshead Revisited]( "Brideshead Revisited")
Brideshead Revisited37,99 €
On 7 October 1908 George Archer-Shee, a naval cadet at the Royal Naval College, Osborne, allegedly stole a 5/- postal order belonging to a fellow cadet. The Navy investigated the allegations, found George guilty and expelled him. This branded George publicly as a thief and destroyed his good name, his planned naval career and his future employability. It also destroyed the good name of his family. The ensuing case by his father against the Admiralty claimed that George was not guilty and that he had been wrongfully expelled. There was widespread public support for the Archer-Shees during the hearing of their case against the Admiralty. Settlement of the case cleared George of any wrongdoing and released the Admiralty from any legal claim for breach of contract or malicious prosecution. George's father then pressed for and obtained an ex gratia payment from the Admiralty. Navy officials always believed George was guilty although commentators have either considered that George was innocent or have left the question open. The present author expresses the view that George was guilty and proposes his own theory.