The Book of Watchers and the Book of Daniel
Apocalypses Engaged in the Interpretation of the Canonical Torah
Versandkostenfrei!
Versandfertig in 6-10 Tagen
52,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
PAYBACK Punkte
26 °P sammeln!
My thesis is that apocalypticism is a response to the canonical Torah. I used canonical analysis, coming from B. S. Childs and J. A. Sanders, with the view that the authority lies in the dialogue between community and the text. The challenge of new revelation and the question about Moses authority caused the tension between Divine Presence tradition and Law tradition in the Canonical Torah to develop into the conflict between the Heavenly Ascent and Law traditions, which produced two early apocalypses. The Book of Watchers criticized the illegitimacy of the Second Temple and the impurity of t...
My thesis is that apocalypticism is a
response to the canonical Torah. I used canonical
analysis, coming from B. S. Childs and J. A.
Sanders, with the view that the authority lies in
the dialogue between community and the text.
The challenge of new revelation and the question
about Moses authority caused the tension between
Divine Presence tradition and Law tradition in the
Canonical Torah to develop into the conflict between
the Heavenly Ascent and Law traditions, which
produced two early apocalypses.
The Book of Watchers criticized the illegitimacy
of the Second Temple and the impurity of the
Jerusalem priesthood, and challenged the exclusivity
of Moses authority with the Heavenly Ascent
tradition. The Book of Daniel defended
Moses authority, and suppressed the concept of
Heavenly Ascent with the Law tradition under Moses
authority by suggesting that new revelation is
available to those who are faithful to the Law of
Moses, or new revelation must be identified with the
interpretation of the Law of
Moses.
response to the canonical Torah. I used canonical
analysis, coming from B. S. Childs and J. A.
Sanders, with the view that the authority lies in
the dialogue between community and the text.
The challenge of new revelation and the question
about Moses authority caused the tension between
Divine Presence tradition and Law tradition in the
Canonical Torah to develop into the conflict between
the Heavenly Ascent and Law traditions, which
produced two early apocalypses.
The Book of Watchers criticized the illegitimacy
of the Second Temple and the impurity of the
Jerusalem priesthood, and challenged the exclusivity
of Moses authority with the Heavenly Ascent
tradition. The Book of Daniel defended
Moses authority, and suppressed the concept of
Heavenly Ascent with the Law tradition under Moses
authority by suggesting that new revelation is
available to those who are faithful to the Law of
Moses, or new revelation must be identified with the
interpretation of the Law of
Moses.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich für
