Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Multiplicity of International Courts and Tribunals]( "Multiplicity of International Courts and Tribunals")
Multiplicity of International Courts and Tribunals51,99 €![The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals]( "The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals")
The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals208,99 €![The Legitimacy of International Trade Courts and Tribunals]( "The Legitimacy of International Trade Courts and Tribunals")
The Legitimacy of International Trade Courts and Tribunals117,99 €![The Environment Through the Lens of International Courts and Tribunals]( "The Environment Through the Lens of International Courts and Tribunals")
The Environment Through the Lens of International Courts and Tribunals110,99 €![The International Legal Responsibility of the European Union in the Context of the World Trade Organization in Areas of Non-Conferred Competences]( "The International Legal Responsibility of the European Union in the Context of the World Trade Organization in Areas of Non-Conferred Competences")
The International Legal Responsibility of the European Union in the Context of the World Trade Organization in Areas of Non-Conferred Competences103,99 €![The Legacy of Ad Hoc Tribunals in International Criminal Law]( "The Legacy of Ad Hoc Tribunals in International Criminal Law")
The Legacy of Ad Hoc Tribunals in International Criminal Law98,99 €![The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals]( "The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals")
The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals116,99 €
This treatise takes issue with the jurisdictions of the arbitral tribunals on sport of the republic of Cameroon and that of Geneva,in Lausanne Switzerland. It seeks to highlight the competences,scopes of these tribunals,the issues of recognition and setting aside of arbitral awards. It also examines,the roles of ordinary law courts,sport tribunals and state authorities in settling disputes arising out of sport.The nerve wracking question is ,which of these institutions has the locus standi to here sport claims?Following our findings,National sport federations have competence to settle sport claims,by virtue of that country's affiliation to the world football governing body.(FIFA) Disputes emanating from National football clubs go to sport arbitral tribunals and not to ordinary law courts or other state organs.But ordinary law courts can listen to sports claims ,when issues of lack of due proccess,public policy ,fraud,incompetence of arbitrators etc arise ,as per the New York Convention of 1958.On another note,it is trite learning that to initiate an issue before an arbitral tribunal,it must be preceded by an arbitration clause ,since arbitration law is a consensual issue.