When is the death penalty considered "cruel and unusual punishment" or "constitutionally permissible"? This book exposes readers directly to landmark opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court that strive to answer difficult questions regarding capital punishment. This book provides far more than an effective overview of the history, current status, and future of capital punishment in America; it supplies excerpts of the words of the justices themselves to make these judicial opinions readily accessible and understandable to general audiences. As a result, readers can see what the justices had to say…mehr
When is the death penalty considered "cruel and unusual punishment" or "constitutionally permissible"? This book exposes readers directly to landmark opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court that strive to answer difficult questions regarding capital punishment. This book provides far more than an effective overview of the history, current status, and future of capital punishment in America; it supplies excerpts of the words of the justices themselves to make these judicial opinions readily accessible and understandable to general audiences. As a result, readers can see what the justices had to say for themselves regarding more than 30 important cases involving the death penalty-without relying on any intermediary interpretations of their statements. After a brief historical summary of the debate over capital punishment and the arguments favoring and opposing capital punishment, the book "decodes" how the justices have interpreted and applied constitutional provisions to historical and contemporary controversies. Each case includes brief narrative commentaries inserted by the authors to provide context for the justices' words. Additionally, the excerpted judicial opinions are presented as primary source documents for the reader's inspection and reflection.Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Preface Background Chapter 1 Introduction Cases: Evolving Standards of Decency and the U.S. Supreme Court's Responses to the Death Penalty Chapter 2 The Road from Wilkerson to Furman: 1878-1971 Death by Firing Squad Wilkerson v. Utah March 17 1879 Death by Electrocution In re Kemmler May 23 1890 Second Attempts at Execution Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber January 13 1947 Other Types of Cruel and Unusual Punishment Trop v. Dulles March 31 1958 Changing Court Opinion Justice Arthur Goldberg Memorandum to the Conference October term 1963 Selection of Jurors Witherspoon v. Illinois June 3 1968 Standardizing the Death Penalty McGautha v. California May 3 1971 Chapter 3 From Furman to Gregg: 1972-1976 Suspending the Death Penalty Furman v. Georgia June 29 1972 Reinstating the Death Penalty Gregg v. Georgia July 2 1976 Chapter 4 After Gregg: 1976-1982 Mandatory Death Penalties Woodson v. North Carolina July 2 1976 Death Penalty for Rape Coker v. Georgia June 29 1977 Mitigating Factors Lockett v. Ohio July 3 1978 Aggravating Factors Godfrey v. Georgia May 19 1980 Additional Mitigating Factors Eddings v. Oklahoma January 19 1982 Chapter 5 Proportionality Culpability and Fitting the Punishment to the Crime: 1982-1989 Limits on the Death Penalty for Accomplices Enmund v. Florida July 2 1982 Repeat Offender Statutes Solem v. Helm June 28 1983 Execution of the Insane Ford v. Wainwright June 26 1986 Allowing the Death Penalty for Accomplices Tison v. Arizona April 21 1987 Use of Statistics Showing Racial Bias McCleskey v. Kemp April 22 1987 Death Penalty for Those under Age 16 Thompson v. Oklahoma June 29 1988 Death Penalty for Those under Age 18 Stanford v. Kentucky June 26 1989 Execution of the Mentally Retarded Penry v. Lynaugh June 26 1989 Chapter 6 From Harmelin to Ring: 1991-2002 Life Sentences for Drug Possession Harmelin v. Michigan June 27 1991 Justice Blackmun Reconsiders the Death Penalty Callins v. Collins February 22 1994 Continuing Incarceration of Sex Offenders Kansas v. Hendricks June 23 1997 Prohibiting the Execution of the Mentally Retarded Atkins v. Virginia June 20 2002 Who Can Levy a Death Sentence? Ring v. Arizona June 24 2002 Chapter 7 Issues and Prospects for the 21st Century: Are Death Rows Facing Death Throes? Execution of Minors Roper v. Simmons March 1 2005 Death by Lethal Injection Baze and Bowling v. Rees April 14 2008 Death Penalty for Rape of a Child Kennedy v. Louisiana June 25 2008 Chapter 8 Locked Up for Life?: Juvenile Offenders and Ever-Evolving Standards of Decency Juvenile Life without Parole for Nonhomicide Crimes Graham v. Florida May 17 2010 Mandatory Life without Parole for Homicide by Juveniles Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Hobbs June 25 2012 Conclusions Chapter 9 Concluding Observations Chapter 10 Chronology Chapter 11 Links and Resources Index About the Authors
Preface Background Chapter 1 Introduction Cases: Evolving Standards of Decency and the U.S. Supreme Court's Responses to the Death Penalty Chapter 2 The Road from Wilkerson to Furman: 1878-1971 Death by Firing Squad Wilkerson v. Utah March 17 1879 Death by Electrocution In re Kemmler May 23 1890 Second Attempts at Execution Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber January 13 1947 Other Types of Cruel and Unusual Punishment Trop v. Dulles March 31 1958 Changing Court Opinion Justice Arthur Goldberg Memorandum to the Conference October term 1963 Selection of Jurors Witherspoon v. Illinois June 3 1968 Standardizing the Death Penalty McGautha v. California May 3 1971 Chapter 3 From Furman to Gregg: 1972-1976 Suspending the Death Penalty Furman v. Georgia June 29 1972 Reinstating the Death Penalty Gregg v. Georgia July 2 1976 Chapter 4 After Gregg: 1976-1982 Mandatory Death Penalties Woodson v. North Carolina July 2 1976 Death Penalty for Rape Coker v. Georgia June 29 1977 Mitigating Factors Lockett v. Ohio July 3 1978 Aggravating Factors Godfrey v. Georgia May 19 1980 Additional Mitigating Factors Eddings v. Oklahoma January 19 1982 Chapter 5 Proportionality Culpability and Fitting the Punishment to the Crime: 1982-1989 Limits on the Death Penalty for Accomplices Enmund v. Florida July 2 1982 Repeat Offender Statutes Solem v. Helm June 28 1983 Execution of the Insane Ford v. Wainwright June 26 1986 Allowing the Death Penalty for Accomplices Tison v. Arizona April 21 1987 Use of Statistics Showing Racial Bias McCleskey v. Kemp April 22 1987 Death Penalty for Those under Age 16 Thompson v. Oklahoma June 29 1988 Death Penalty for Those under Age 18 Stanford v. Kentucky June 26 1989 Execution of the Mentally Retarded Penry v. Lynaugh June 26 1989 Chapter 6 From Harmelin to Ring: 1991-2002 Life Sentences for Drug Possession Harmelin v. Michigan June 27 1991 Justice Blackmun Reconsiders the Death Penalty Callins v. Collins February 22 1994 Continuing Incarceration of Sex Offenders Kansas v. Hendricks June 23 1997 Prohibiting the Execution of the Mentally Retarded Atkins v. Virginia June 20 2002 Who Can Levy a Death Sentence? Ring v. Arizona June 24 2002 Chapter 7 Issues and Prospects for the 21st Century: Are Death Rows Facing Death Throes? Execution of Minors Roper v. Simmons March 1 2005 Death by Lethal Injection Baze and Bowling v. Rees April 14 2008 Death Penalty for Rape of a Child Kennedy v. Louisiana June 25 2008 Chapter 8 Locked Up for Life?: Juvenile Offenders and Ever-Evolving Standards of Decency Juvenile Life without Parole for Nonhomicide Crimes Graham v. Florida May 17 2010 Mandatory Life without Parole for Homicide by Juveniles Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Hobbs June 25 2012 Conclusions Chapter 9 Concluding Observations Chapter 10 Chronology Chapter 11 Links and Resources Index About the Authors
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Internetauftritt der buecher.de internetstores GmbH
Geschäftsführung: Monica Sawhney | Roland Kölbl | Günter Hilger
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Batheyer Straße 115 - 117, 58099 Hagen
Postanschrift: Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg
Amtsgericht Hagen HRB 13257
Steuernummer: 321/neu