Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Solution Focused Classroom Guidance]( "Solution Focused Classroom Guidance")
Solution Focused Classroom Guidance38,99 €![DEVELOPMENT OF A GUIDANCE PROGRAMME FOR STUDENTS]( "DEVELOPMENT OF A GUIDANCE PROGRAMME FOR STUDENTS")
DEVELOPMENT OF A GUIDANCE PROGRAMME FOR STUDENTS44,99 €![Samuel Beckett: The Expressive Dilemma]( "Samuel Beckett: The Expressive Dilemma")
Samuel Beckett: The Expressive Dilemma74,99 €![Career guidance and Training: Critical tool to solving unemployment?]( "Career guidance and Training: Critical tool to solving unemployment?")
Career guidance and Training: Critical tool to solving unemployment?32,99 €![Interactive Whiteboard Technology in the Language Classroom]( "Interactive Whiteboard Technology in the Language Classroom")
Interactive Whiteboard Technology in the Language Classroom51,99 €![Under the microscope: CLIL teaching materials for Biology]( "Under the microscope: CLIL teaching materials for Biology")
Under the microscope: CLIL teaching materials for Biology44,99 €![Corporate Parenting: The Contribution of Designated Teachers]( "Corporate Parenting: The Contribution of Designated Teachers")
Corporate Parenting: The Contribution of Designated Teachers51,99 €
Recent reforms in US science instruction have
encouraged teachers to engage students in the process
of inquiry, but have not given clear direction on the
extent to which students should, or should not, be
guided toward particular conclusions. This paper is a
multiple-method exploration of the nature of guidance
four middle school teachers provided during
discussions during a physical science unit about
density. Pre and posttests of students conceptual
understanding identified teachers whose students had
high and low learning gains through the course of the
unit. Videotapes of each teacher s lessons were then
coded according to a framework of authoritative,
dialogic, and blended guidance, as well as the
conceptual levels addressed during discussions.
Results indicate that the teachers whose students had
higher learning gains at the end of the unit shifted
more often between authoritative and dialogic
communicative approaches, and led discussions which
more closely mapped onto the expected conceptual
progression underlying the unit. The study highlights
the importance of actively shifting guidance to
develop students conceptual understanding during
inquiry-based teaching.
encouraged teachers to engage students in the process
of inquiry, but have not given clear direction on the
extent to which students should, or should not, be
guided toward particular conclusions. This paper is a
multiple-method exploration of the nature of guidance
four middle school teachers provided during
discussions during a physical science unit about
density. Pre and posttests of students conceptual
understanding identified teachers whose students had
high and low learning gains through the course of the
unit. Videotapes of each teacher s lessons were then
coded according to a framework of authoritative,
dialogic, and blended guidance, as well as the
conceptual levels addressed during discussions.
Results indicate that the teachers whose students had
higher learning gains at the end of the unit shifted
more often between authoritative and dialogic
communicative approaches, and led discussions which
more closely mapped onto the expected conceptual
progression underlying the unit. The study highlights
the importance of actively shifting guidance to
develop students conceptual understanding during
inquiry-based teaching.