The first full study of the survival of Lucretius' De rerum natura, the controversial six-book poem espousing Epicurean philosophy. A detailed analysis of the poem's circulation, readers and commentators in antiquity, as well as its medieval scribes and owners, sheds light on the poem's tenuous threads of transmission.
The first full study of the survival of Lucretius' De rerum natura, the controversial six-book poem espousing Epicurean philosophy. A detailed analysis of the poem's circulation, readers and commentators in antiquity, as well as its medieval scribes and owners, sheds light on the poem's tenuous threads of transmission.
David Butterfield is a Fellow of Queens' College and Lecturer in Classics at the University of Cambridge.
Inhaltsangabe
Preface Introduction 1. A sketch of the extant Lucretian manuscripts 2. The indirect tradition of Lucretius 3. The capitula of DRN 4. The correcting hands of O 5. The marginal annotations of Q1 Conclusion Appendix 1. Capitula Lucretiana Appendix 2. Apparatus fontium Lucreti (ante a.d. millesimum) Appendix 3. The corrections and annotations of O Appendix 4. The foliation of the Lucretian archetype Appendix 5. The fate of OQS in the early modern period.
Preface Introduction 1. A sketch of the extant Lucretian manuscripts 2. The indirect tradition of Lucretius 3. The capitula of DRN 4. The correcting hands of O 5. The marginal annotations of Q1 Conclusion Appendix 1. Capitula Lucretiana Appendix 2. Apparatus fontium Lucreti (ante a.d. millesimum) Appendix 3. The corrections and annotations of O Appendix 4. The foliation of the Lucretian archetype Appendix 5. The fate of OQS in the early modern period.
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
