Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Distribution of Losses from Large Terrorist Attacks Under the Terrorism Risk Insurance ACT (2005)]( "Distribution of Losses from Large Terrorist Attacks Under the Terrorism Risk Insurance ACT (2005)")
Distribution of Losses from Large Terrorist Attacks Under the Terrorism Risk Insurance ACT (2005)21,99 €![Civil Liberties and Canadian Federalism]( "Civil Liberties and Canadian Federalism")
Civil Liberties and Canadian Federalism21,99 €![Asbestos Bankruptcy Trusts]( "Asbestos Bankruptcy Trusts")
Asbestos Bankruptcy Trusts29,99 €![Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States]( "Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States")
Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States38,99 €![Agriculture: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change for the United States]( "Agriculture: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change for the United States")
Agriculture: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change for the United States98,99 €![A Brief Exposition of the Constitution of the United States]( "A Brief Exposition of the Constitution of the United States")
A Brief Exposition of the Constitution of the United States14,99 €![Constitution of the United States of America]( "Constitution of the United States of America")
Constitution of the United States of America21,99 €
No-fault auto insurance opponents frequently argue that no-fault may ultimately lead to higher auto insurance costs by reducing drivers' incentives to drive carefully and thereby increasing the accident rate. The intuition behind this criticism of no-fault is simple: No-fault auto insurance lowers the cost of driving negligently by limiting first-party liability for the injuries suffered by third parties in auto accidents. This report evaluates this criticism of no-fault by examining trends in fatal and non-fatal auto accidents rates and rates of driver negligence in the U.S. between 1967-89. This report finds no evidence that the adoption of no-fault auto insurance between 1971-76 in 16 states increased fatal accident rates in those states and no correlation between the presence of no-fault auto insurance and a state's overall accident rate or rate of driver negligence.