Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Utility of Conventional Ballistic Missiles in Asymmetric Warfare]( "The Utility of Conventional Ballistic Missiles in Asymmetric Warfare")
The Utility of Conventional Ballistic Missiles in Asymmetric Warfare60,99 €![Examination of Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Development Within the United States from 1952 to 1965]( "Examination of Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Development Within the United States from 1952 to 1965")
Examination of Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Development Within the United States from 1952 to 196560,99 €![Reducing the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Alert Rate and the Impact on Maintenance Utilization]( "Reducing the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Alert Rate and the Impact on Maintenance Utilization")
Reducing the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Alert Rate and the Impact on Maintenance Utilization60,99 €![Reducing the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Alert Rate and the Impact on Maintenance: Utilization]( "Reducing the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Alert Rate and the Impact on Maintenance: Utilization")
Reducing the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Alert Rate and the Impact on Maintenance: Utilization60,99 €![Improving Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Maintenance Scheduling through the Use of Location Analysis Methodologies]( "Improving Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Maintenance Scheduling through the Use of Location Analysis Methodologies")
Improving Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Maintenance Scheduling through the Use of Location Analysis Methodologies60,99 €![Heads, Not Tails: How Best to Engage Theater Ballistic Missiles?]( "Heads, Not Tails: How Best to Engage Theater Ballistic Missiles?")
Heads, Not Tails: How Best to Engage Theater Ballistic Missiles?60,99 €![Heads, Not Tails: How Best to Engage Theater Ballistic Missiles?]( "Heads, Not Tails: How Best to Engage Theater Ballistic Missiles?")
Heads, Not Tails: How Best to Engage Theater Ballistic Missiles?60,99 €
Although the United States (US) is no longer in an arms race with another superpower and there is reduced fear of a potential global nuclear war, there are still states who have nuclear weapons and others-states and non-state actors-who pursue them. Therefore, "the [Intercontinental Ballistic Missile] ICBM-ready, accurate, able to blast any target on Earth in 35 minutes-will continue to occupy an important place" in the United State's continuum of capabilities.1 These ICBMs have already been around for more than 40 years and their mission has remained steady. Their mission has been to deter any aggressor. But, if deterrence fails, ICBMs would withstand the attack and provide the ability to instantly retaliate. Additionally, from the Cold War through today, all ICBMs have had nuclear warheads and inertial type guidance systems to strike their targets. As this paper is being written, however, Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) is looking at the viability of fielding an ICBM "equipped with high-explosive, precision-guided warheads" to deliver conventional ordinance on strategic targets.2 But, is this capability really needed?