The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate
Herausgeber: Clarke, Steve; Coady, Tony; Savulescu, Julian
The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate
Herausgeber: Clarke, Steve; Coady, Tony; Savulescu, Julian
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
An international team of ethicists refresh the debate about human enhancement by examining whether resistance to the use of technology to enhance our mental and physical capabilities can be supported by articulated philosophical reasoning, or explained away, e.g. in terms of psychological influences on moral reasoning.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- K. LeeThe Philosophical Foundations of Modern Medicine37,99 €
- M. FaganPhilosophy of Stem Cell Biology37,99 €
- K. LeeThe Philosophical Foundations of Modern Medicine37,99 €
- M. FaganPhilosophy of Stem Cell Biology37,99 €
- Daniel S GoldbergThe Bioethics of Pain Management219,99 €
- Rachel CooperClassifying Madness119,99 €
- John McmillanMethods of Bioethics86,99 €
-
-
-
An international team of ethicists refresh the debate about human enhancement by examining whether resistance to the use of technology to enhance our mental and physical capabilities can be supported by articulated philosophical reasoning, or explained away, e.g. in terms of psychological influences on moral reasoning.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Oxford University Press, USA
- Seitenzahl: 320
- Erscheinungstermin: 20. Dezember 2016
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 236mm x 152mm x 23mm
- Gewicht: 567g
- ISBN-13: 9780198754855
- ISBN-10: 019875485X
- Artikelnr.: 47866457
- Verlag: Oxford University Press, USA
- Seitenzahl: 320
- Erscheinungstermin: 20. Dezember 2016
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 236mm x 152mm x 23mm
- Gewicht: 567g
- ISBN-13: 9780198754855
- ISBN-10: 019875485X
- Artikelnr.: 47866457
Steve Clarke is Associate Professor in the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University and a Senior Research Associate in the Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford. He is the author of over sixty papers in refereed journals and edited collections, as well as two books, including The Justification of Religious Violence, Malden MA, Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. He is also a co-editor of three books. The most recent of these is Clarke, S., Powell, R. and Savulescu. J. (eds.) 2013. Religion, Intolerance and Conflict: a Scientific and Conceptual Investigation, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. Julian Savulescu is Uehiro Chair in Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford. He directs the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics and the Oxford Centre for Neuroethics in the Faculty of Philosophy. He is co-author of I. Persson and J. Savulescu, Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012; and he edits the Journal of Medical Ethics. His areas of expertise include the ethics of genetics; research ethics; new forms of reproduction, medical ethics, sports ethics and the analytic philosophical basis of practical ethics. Julian is a founder member of the Hinxton Group. C.A.J. Coady is one of Australia's best-known philosophers. He has an outstanding international reputation for his writings on epistemology and on political violence and political ethics. His book Testimony: a Philosophical Study (OUP, 1992) has been particularly influential and more recently he published Morality and Political Violence (CUP, 2008). In 2005, he gave the Uehiro Lectures on Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford, which were subsequently published in 2008 by Oxford University Press under the title, Messy Morality: the Challenge of Politics. Alberto Giubilini is Research Associate on the Australian Research Council Discovery Project "Moral Conservatism, Human Enhancement and the 'Affective Revolution' in Moral Psychology". He specialises in medical ethics and bioethics. His research interests include human enhancement, medical end-of-life decisions, reproductive ethics, bioethical conflicts, and moral psychology. Sagar Sanyal is Research Fellow at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics at the University of Melbourne. His research interests include the ethics of enhancement, the ethics of war, and global justice. His publications have appeared in the Journal of Philosophy and the International Journal of Applied Philosophy.
* Introductory Chapter
* 1: Alberto Giubilini and Sagar Sanyal: Challenging Human Enhancement
* Section One: Understanding the Debate
* 2: C. A. J. Coady: Reason, Emotion, and Morality: Some Cautions for
the Enhancement Project
* 3: Joshua May: Repugnance as Performance Error: the Role of Disgust
in Bioethical Intuitions
* 4: Doug McConnell and Jeanette Kennett: Reasons, Reflection and
Repugnance
* 5: Linda Barclay: A Natural Alliance against a Common Foe? Opponents
of Enhancement and the Social Model of Disability
* 6: John Weckert: Playing God: What is the Problem?
* 7: John McMillan: Conservative and Critical Morality in Debate about
Reproductive Technologies
* 8: Chris Gyngell and Michael J. Selgelid: Enhancing Human Enhancement
* 9: Robert Sparrow: Human Enhancement for Whom?
* Section Two: Advancing the Debate
* 10: Rebecca Roache and Julian Savulescu: Enhancing Conservatism
* 11: Bernadette Tobin: MacIntyre s Paradox
* 12: Jonathan Pugh, Guy Kahane and Julian Savulescu: Partiality for
Humanity and Enhancement
* 13: Nicholas Agar: Enhancement, Mind-uploading, and Personal Identity
* 14: Michael Hauskeller: Levelling the Playing Field: on the Alleged
Unfairness of the Genetic Lottery
* 15: Steve Clarke: Buchanan and the Conservative Argument against
Human Enhancement from Biological and Social Harmony
* 16: Gregory E. Kaebnick: Moral enhancement, enhancement, and
sentiment
* 17: Russell Powell and Allen Buchanan: The Evolution of Moral
Enhancement
* 1: Alberto Giubilini and Sagar Sanyal: Challenging Human Enhancement
* Section One: Understanding the Debate
* 2: C. A. J. Coady: Reason, Emotion, and Morality: Some Cautions for
the Enhancement Project
* 3: Joshua May: Repugnance as Performance Error: the Role of Disgust
in Bioethical Intuitions
* 4: Doug McConnell and Jeanette Kennett: Reasons, Reflection and
Repugnance
* 5: Linda Barclay: A Natural Alliance against a Common Foe? Opponents
of Enhancement and the Social Model of Disability
* 6: John Weckert: Playing God: What is the Problem?
* 7: John McMillan: Conservative and Critical Morality in Debate about
Reproductive Technologies
* 8: Chris Gyngell and Michael J. Selgelid: Enhancing Human Enhancement
* 9: Robert Sparrow: Human Enhancement for Whom?
* Section Two: Advancing the Debate
* 10: Rebecca Roache and Julian Savulescu: Enhancing Conservatism
* 11: Bernadette Tobin: MacIntyre s Paradox
* 12: Jonathan Pugh, Guy Kahane and Julian Savulescu: Partiality for
Humanity and Enhancement
* 13: Nicholas Agar: Enhancement, Mind-uploading, and Personal Identity
* 14: Michael Hauskeller: Levelling the Playing Field: on the Alleged
Unfairness of the Genetic Lottery
* 15: Steve Clarke: Buchanan and the Conservative Argument against
Human Enhancement from Biological and Social Harmony
* 16: Gregory E. Kaebnick: Moral enhancement, enhancement, and
sentiment
* 17: Russell Powell and Allen Buchanan: The Evolution of Moral
Enhancement
* Introductory Chapter
* 1: Alberto Giubilini and Sagar Sanyal: Challenging Human Enhancement
* Section One: Understanding the Debate
* 2: C. A. J. Coady: Reason, Emotion, and Morality: Some Cautions for
the Enhancement Project
* 3: Joshua May: Repugnance as Performance Error: the Role of Disgust
in Bioethical Intuitions
* 4: Doug McConnell and Jeanette Kennett: Reasons, Reflection and
Repugnance
* 5: Linda Barclay: A Natural Alliance against a Common Foe? Opponents
of Enhancement and the Social Model of Disability
* 6: John Weckert: Playing God: What is the Problem?
* 7: John McMillan: Conservative and Critical Morality in Debate about
Reproductive Technologies
* 8: Chris Gyngell and Michael J. Selgelid: Enhancing Human Enhancement
* 9: Robert Sparrow: Human Enhancement for Whom?
* Section Two: Advancing the Debate
* 10: Rebecca Roache and Julian Savulescu: Enhancing Conservatism
* 11: Bernadette Tobin: MacIntyre s Paradox
* 12: Jonathan Pugh, Guy Kahane and Julian Savulescu: Partiality for
Humanity and Enhancement
* 13: Nicholas Agar: Enhancement, Mind-uploading, and Personal Identity
* 14: Michael Hauskeller: Levelling the Playing Field: on the Alleged
Unfairness of the Genetic Lottery
* 15: Steve Clarke: Buchanan and the Conservative Argument against
Human Enhancement from Biological and Social Harmony
* 16: Gregory E. Kaebnick: Moral enhancement, enhancement, and
sentiment
* 17: Russell Powell and Allen Buchanan: The Evolution of Moral
Enhancement
* 1: Alberto Giubilini and Sagar Sanyal: Challenging Human Enhancement
* Section One: Understanding the Debate
* 2: C. A. J. Coady: Reason, Emotion, and Morality: Some Cautions for
the Enhancement Project
* 3: Joshua May: Repugnance as Performance Error: the Role of Disgust
in Bioethical Intuitions
* 4: Doug McConnell and Jeanette Kennett: Reasons, Reflection and
Repugnance
* 5: Linda Barclay: A Natural Alliance against a Common Foe? Opponents
of Enhancement and the Social Model of Disability
* 6: John Weckert: Playing God: What is the Problem?
* 7: John McMillan: Conservative and Critical Morality in Debate about
Reproductive Technologies
* 8: Chris Gyngell and Michael J. Selgelid: Enhancing Human Enhancement
* 9: Robert Sparrow: Human Enhancement for Whom?
* Section Two: Advancing the Debate
* 10: Rebecca Roache and Julian Savulescu: Enhancing Conservatism
* 11: Bernadette Tobin: MacIntyre s Paradox
* 12: Jonathan Pugh, Guy Kahane and Julian Savulescu: Partiality for
Humanity and Enhancement
* 13: Nicholas Agar: Enhancement, Mind-uploading, and Personal Identity
* 14: Michael Hauskeller: Levelling the Playing Field: on the Alleged
Unfairness of the Genetic Lottery
* 15: Steve Clarke: Buchanan and the Conservative Argument against
Human Enhancement from Biological and Social Harmony
* 16: Gregory E. Kaebnick: Moral enhancement, enhancement, and
sentiment
* 17: Russell Powell and Allen Buchanan: The Evolution of Moral
Enhancement