Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Der Europäische Gerichtshof als Prinzipal, Agent und Akteur]( "Der Europäische Gerichtshof als Prinzipal, Agent und Akteur")
Der Europäische Gerichtshof als Prinzipal, Agent und Akteur15,95 €![Relationship between the European Court of Justice and the National Constitutional Courts. The control of legislative competences of the European Union]( "Relationship between the European Court of Justice and the National Constitutional Courts. The control of legislative competences of the European Union")
Relationship between the European Court of Justice and the National Constitutional Courts. The control of legislative competences of the European Union17,95 €![Warming up for the EU. Iceland and European Integration]( "Warming up for the EU. Iceland and European Integration")
Warming up for the EU. Iceland and European Integration47,95 €![The Treaty of Maastricht - the Result of Rational State Preferences?]( "The Treaty of Maastricht - the Result of Rational State Preferences?")
The Treaty of Maastricht - the Result of Rational State Preferences?16,95 €![Taking the EU to Court]( "Taking the EU to Court")
Taking the EU to Court21,99 €![Taking the EU to Court]( "Taking the EU to Court")
Taking the EU to Court15,99 €![Ein neuer deutscher Euroskeptizismus als Gefahr für die europäische Integration?]( "Ein neuer deutscher Euroskeptizismus als Gefahr für die europäische Integration?")
Ein neuer deutscher Euroskeptizismus als Gefahr für die europäische Integration?18,95 €
Essay from the year 2016 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 69 Prozent (1,7), Cardiff University, language: English, abstract: The question of the role of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the process of European integration has been a matter of long-standing academic dispute between neo-functionalistsand intergovernmentalists. In this essay it will be argued that the ECJ can be seen as an engine of European integration but the court - founded along with the other core institutions of theEuropean Union (EU) in the 1950s - depends on the assistance of other actors. The explanation of this assertion is unfolded in three steps. At first this paper will provide a brief overview of neo-functionalism and intergovernmentalism and their dispute concerning the ECJ. Secondly, the 'magic triangle' (Vauchez 2008, p. 8) consisting of 'direct effect', 'supremacy' and 'preliminary ruling' - which allows the ECJ to have an impact on the integration process - will be examined and it will be explained why these three mentioned rules are so important for the European legal order. Thirdly, it is claimed that there are limits of the court's judicial law-making and thus its role in the process of European integration should not be overestimated.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.